this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
281 points (99.0% liked)

politics

31158 readers
18 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Leaked records show that Tulsi Gabbard, now director of national intelligence, reused the same weak password across personal accounts for years, including during her congressional tenure on sensitive committees.

The password, containing “shraddha,” an offshoot of the Hare Krishna movement into which she was reportedly born and which former members have accused of being a cult, appeared in multiple data breaches.

Though not used on government accounts, the reuse violated basic cybersecurity practices. Gabbard’s team dismissed scrutiny as “bigoted” and politically motivated.

Experts warn such behavior poses serious security risks, especially given Gabbard's current role overseeing U.S. intelligence and national security operations.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

I was going to comment a joke saying that it must have been "Iminacult1234" only to find out that it was actually a reference to her cult. She shouldn't be anywhere near power.

[–] ScrambledEggs@lazysoci.al 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The password to her luggage is 12345

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Shit, I need to change the password on my luggage....

(That joke hasn't aged well, because the TSA has keys to unlock all our luggage now....)

[–] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can just jam a ballpoint pen through most zippers then zip back over it to reclose leaving the lock undisturbed.

[–] drhodl@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah. A zipper on luggage you care about, is pretty stupid.

[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Those locks were never very secure in the first place.

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only if you use a TSA lock. And those TSA keys started as a collection of keys that were just commonly reused across locks, so people kept them around.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure the keys got leaked online and you can 3d print copies for yourself

[–] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

When you have a model number or entire brands or multiple brands that are all keyed alike and sold publicly, it hardly counts as a leak. You could go to Walmart and find them there too. Even before they were called TSA keys.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

So the combination is one, two, three, four, five. That's the stupidest combination I've ever heard in my life! That's the kinda thing an idiot would have on his luggage!

Holy shaddrah these people are bad

[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

User: tgabbard

Password: missskunkystripe666

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago
[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Of course she did. She doesn’t want to make it hard for Putin.

[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago

Buttery males!

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

russiarules12345

Surely they are making a fuss, who would be interested in targeting the head of national security to one of the biggest countries (and most hated by easterners) on Earth?

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I knew it. I'm surrounded by assholes!

[–] RockBottom@feddit.org 2 points 1 year ago

National what?

[–] SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Meh, I use the same super-weak password for tons of sites I don’t give a flying fuck about.

I took all the military opsec and infosec courses, because I was in intel, and my partner is currently an IT security professional, but some accounts just don’t warrant giving a damn.

I don’t use it for anything important, I let my password manager handle those, but bullshit “create an account to checkout” stuff that I use another payment system for? Meh.

This doesn’t seem like news, beyond looking for something to report on.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 year ago

(There is no indication that she used the password on government accounts.)

Why do we care then?

MOST PEOPLE re-use passwords for everything. Most people use the most-used passwords in every data breach as their passwords. Stuff like this shouldn't surprise anyone. Most members of government likely don't even know what 2FA is, and likely use Password123 as their password. They're not known for being tech wiz's.