who controls the keys / where are the keys?
Users will know that a conversation is end-to-end encrypted when they see a new lock icon
๐ imagine trusting an emoji
this post was submitted on 12 May 2026
21 points (86.2% liked)
Privacy
5632 readers
284 users here now
Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.
Rules
PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!
- Be civil and no prejudice
- Don't promote big-tech software
- No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
- No reposting of news that was already posted
- No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
- No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)
Related communities:
Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.
- !opensource@programming.dev
- !selfhosting@slrpnk.net / !selfhosted@lemmy.world
- !piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !drm@lemmy.dbzer0.com
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I know it isn't perfect, but this is absolutely massive for privacy.
While most of my close friends and family have shifted to signal, most people I talk to are still using the default apps.
Inevitable metadata leaks aside this will close the loop on literally billions of conversations. I'll take the big privacy W when I can.
No, it isn't massive for privacy.
It's hardware-bound, meaning at a minimum who you're communicating with and when will always be known, today and in the future.
And I haven't seen anything showing that it has Perfect Forward Secrecy, so all someone has to do is save the messages and if it's ever cracked, they'll know exactly what you said, when, and which device.
It's a feel good to make people think something is being done, when it's far from "good".
BTW, hardware-bound ID was determined to be a bad idea 40 years ago. Even SPX moved away from it in the 90's.