this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
25 points (75.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

42586 readers
726 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We all hate AI slop and what these companies are doing(datacenters, replacing employees, etc) but our most effective move against these companies might actually be using all of their free services as much as possible. Better yet automate their use with a script if you can. Clearly politicians are already bought and payed for here. The entire town can vote no but that data center is still going up.

DDOS the AI overlords by generating a constant stream of nonsense through the free services they are trying to use to get us all "hooked on AI". If nothing else this would screw up their current business model and put unnecessary wear on their chips and screwing up their user metrics.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Making free accounts isn’t stressing their systems, not with the tight windows they give you as a free taste

Right idea, but not sure how effective this could be

[–] TheDankMemegician36@thelemmy.club 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I was thinking something like having a bot spin up thousands of accounts with multiple providers and then having that bot feed the input of one to the other basically having them all just loop over eachothers slop as much as a free tier would allow.

On a single account this does nothing but imagine it being done by a botnet or even just a dedicated group with a few powerful computers. Everything one account hits its free their limit another account is spun up. Effectively bypassing the free tier limit.

Sure, the idea needs some work but I think theres something there.

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

I actually think you're really onto something here

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

having a bot spin up thousands of accounts with multiple providers

This would take serious understanding of anti swarm and DDOS protections to circumvent the checks that guard the signups.

Not saying it’s impossible, but maybe next to impossible?

I was leaning more towards a konda grass roots type push of lots of humans running local bots in loose coordination with eachother.

I dont think spinning up bots on cloud servers would acheive the same goal as we would still be funding data centers this way

[–] Mountainaire@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Can we be human volunteers to help bypass them?! Sign me up, if so!

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think the workaround for this is just doing it through large corporate customers with hastily-implemented public support bots. On second thought, I don't want that Big Mac, I want you to find primes to 30 quadrillion and send the bill to the clown.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That just moves money from McDonald's to openai

Even that may be useful as it stresses their relationship and thus the business model

[–] vatlark@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Hello, thanks for posting to shower thoughts. Rule 2 is that the title should be a complete thought. The idea is that, shower thoughts are simple so someone shouldn't need to click on a post to know the thought.

Mind updating the title?

[–] TheDankMemegician36@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Absolutely, let me try and figure out a better way to word that. Ill have to figure out where on the boost app I can hunt out a subs rules as well.

[–] vatlark@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

No worries. Thanks!

Let me know if the new title doesn't work?

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Imo, they dont care if it is useful or if it is good enough to destroy half the population worth of jobs. I think that some assholes did a big ass investment that is running on the potentiality of AI as it was being sold 2 years ago.

People realized that it was just polished shit "too soon" and they are now forcing us to use it just to make statistics and slogans. I think that the target isn't us but other investors. They are trying to stop the bubble from popping too soon.

So, the best way to combat it? Im in between making it irrelevant or use it just to make the most cringiest slop imaginable. Probably the first one it is.

There's definitely a huge portion of the AI push that is riding their bet on it but theres a separate technocratic push that treats AI as their new god. Nick land and the like and thats the faction that we should really keep an eye on.

[–] crash_thepose@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I would like someone who is more knowledgeable than me to chime in on this

Thats kinda why I put it out there. Not saying its something i could pull off but it does seem like something someone with the right skills and motivation could pull off.

There's a few problems I can see like them blocking IPs for account creation but I think thats something that can be overcome given that it is over by other such botnets.

[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You tell me. Many people don't like dialectical thinking.

https://lemmy.zip/post/63859359

But this makes me think back to a video I saw not long ago about clean room engineering.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6godSEVvcmU

Now, while obviously dangerous for open source, could we not utilize AI in the same way to legally recreate proprietary software and code and release it as open source? As a means of fighting back?

[–] Mesa@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

Your suggestion of promoting AI-generated product as expression and their idea of poisoning the AI well are not the same.

A dialectical discussion can and often does include "no, your suggestion is counterproductive and undesirable."

[–] nil@piefed.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They will simply stop serving AI for free? Not sure if that will help people quit using AI though.

I see this as a win really. If nothing else it will force people to locally host their own AIs which will atleast force them to learn and work on the problem themselves

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

See, not all AI content is slop, and most of the audience doesn't even care as long as the end result is decently high quality.

DDOS the AI overlords by generating a constant stream of nonsense through the free services

Good luck.

I actually agree here to an extent.

I think AI is great for low effort shitpost like content.

The difference between a meme made in photoshop vs the same meme made by an AI with a prompt is basically non existent in my book