this post was submitted on 16 May 2026
337 points (100.0% liked)

Progressive Politics

4616 readers
930 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Inucune@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

If a corporation is a person, it should have to apply for civil service and be subject to draft. Let me know if there are any other things a 'person' is subject to that should extend to a corporation as a person.

[–] Inucune@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Oh! It should have a social security number and pay into social security and taxes as a 'person' in addition to any it pays as a corporation.

It should have to carry health insurance for the corporate 'person' (let insurance companies have fun with that), or purchase it from the market like everyone else.

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As explained by More Perfect Union, the law, which is set to take effect next July, classifies corporations as “artificial persons” who do not have a constitutional right to make political donations.

“The bill could limit the influence of super PACs,” noted More Perfect Union, “and be a model to challenge the influence of money in politics.”

Democratic Hawaii state Sen. Jarrett Keohokalole, a supporter of the law, said on Thursday he was proud that Hawaii has become “the first state in the nation” to take direct action challenging Citizens United.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'll be the first to say don't let perfect get in the way of good, but God damn. We knew this legislation was a problem since the moment it was proposed. Even before that we wrote legislation that exluded it, on purpose, and it only came about through fucking weasel words and what not.

Why has it taken this long to produce this, and why does it have to take effect after midterms?

[–] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

Because most politicians are corporatists regardless of party.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe they are hoping that after midterms, there will be a shift in power that might somehow (I have no idea how) allow this law to stand.

[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 4 points 17 hours ago

They could guarantee it by making it effective now

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unfortunately the traitors in the black robes have the final say here

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 40 points 1 day ago

The Judiciary has no way to enforce their decisions. As evidenced by the Trump Admin just ignoring court orders.

Why are we just accepting the obviously corrupted court's decisions at this point?

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would love to hear MAGAs be forced to argue against this when they go all "biology/science expert" when it comes to trans issues.

[–] NotEasyBeingGreen@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago

I think their argument will be along the lines of saying that a corporation is just s group of people, so has rights of all of those people by proxy. I'm not sure what the answer will be if one then immediately asks about unions though...

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 16 points 1 day ago

woa. why the heck has my state not done this.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Hawaii was stolen anyways.

I bet you're fun at parties.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago

I have found that the people who say stuff like "you must be fun at parties" are not fun to party with

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

you rn

My post was for the ignorant, maybe like you. It's called intersecting, in anarchism. Maybe something you’ve never done.

Now, let's serious: are you going to help liberate Hawaii, or do you get a kick about mentioning how imperial nations colonize others?

[–] unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth 0 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, the irony of talking about liberating a place where the majority of people don't have any interest of seceding while also railing against imperialism.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Glad you actually comprehend the hypocrisy.

Do you see any other means to progress?

[–] unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You're literally commenting on an article on one of the means to progress.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 points 15 hours ago

To show much more work needs to be done.