this post was submitted on 19 May 2026
322 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

84796 readers
4346 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Yeah, great because ocean habitat already straining from warming oceans are going to love having AI that produces nothing but hallucinations and pron heat up the waters even more.

[–] Karmanopoly@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

Computers and electronics love salt water

[–] TerdFerguson@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Wind-powered datacentre that uses less energy overall and doesn't consume drinking water.

Technology advancing in all the different domains that make this a viable solution are a good thing. Everyone can calm down with their emotional takes.

[–] flightyhobler@lemmy.world 7 points 3 hours ago

So salt water can be used!? 🤔

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 7 points 6 hours ago

Fish soup, coming right up.

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 42 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

So this is how we boil the oceans? With fucking underwater AI data centers. Definitely not on my bingo card

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 28 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

What will this do to the local ocean ecosystems?

China doesn't care. The US doesn't care.

People care... But who are we? What do we matter?

[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu -2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I think the dissipation must be extremely efficient. They might have instruments in place to monitor the effects (?) but I'd say the water temperature must be that of the surrouding ocean,.. at worst something like 1m away from the radiators? I'm not a physicist. Perhaps the heightened temperature can even provide a hook of sorts for some species? like a weak hydrothermal vent? could be interesting to study.

In any case, the one thing that's going to tear us apart is water availability. I think it's smart to do away with that requirement for a data center.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 22 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Okay, who had the bright idea of boiling the ocean to make soup?

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 6 points 1 hour ago

God, the insane amount of energy it would take to even remotely measure a difference in the ocean water is astronomical. You might be able to cause some small impact in a relatively small radius that could impact wildlife, but I feel like there are open enough areas that not much would be impacted in the area.

[–] darkmogool@feddit.org 1 points 6 hours ago

Send the torpedos…

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago

So its like a giant electric kettle filament?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

its likely more expensive, since maintenance logistics to fix, replace chips is higher than one on land. the only offset is the cooling effects at deeper waters. since they are barely paying for electricity , or water as it is on land.

[–] motruck@lemmy.zip 68 points 22 hours ago (18 children)

Let's boil the ocean everyone.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 hours ago

How long until someone has the idea to put them near already-melting glaciers

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

We... We're already doing that.

Sorry. :/

I didn't know you'd find out this way.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

But now we're doing it more efficiently!

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›