this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
130 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

43134 readers
519 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Korkki@lemmy.ml 50 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Those Yankee sanctions really keep backfiring, don't they?

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 18 points 3 months ago

love to see it

[–] HAL_9_TRILLION@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wouldn't it be great if this would benefit us, real people?

amazon: best I can do is 1TB SSD for $179.

[–] m532@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

"Real" people? Are there fake people?

[–] samsamsamsam@discuss.online 8 points 3 months ago

I guess the sentiment is everyday individuals and not the corporates and the wealthy. Financial benefits of advancements rarely seem to benefit common folks

[–] moriquende@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Corporations

[–] prex@aussie.zone 3 points 3 months ago

I suppose on twitter & reddit.

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 2 points 3 months ago

Seriously? Have you never run into a right-winger?

[–] zeet@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

From the thumbnail, I expected: Scientists develop world's thinnest waffle.

[–] PixTupy@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That would be impressive but I bet it would be the most disappointing bite.

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 6 points 3 months ago

~~bite~~ byte

FTFY.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

The Dutch have entered the chat.

[–] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 3 months ago
[–] Miller@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If I had been the project leader on this it would have had an even greater capacity because I would have taped a couple of keyring flash drives around the edge.

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 3 points 3 months ago

They're needed just to hold the massive encryption key, I'm assuming.

[–] ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Anyone else convinced AES-256 is not long enough a but length for full disk encryption anymore? Even the 512-bit schemes are just trying some offset-salts that, with ~10TB I worry about providing close-enough statistical significance for cryptanalysis.

With 100TB drives?! I am less worried and more... convinced its a problem.

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 months ago

I have to admit, that I never looked into the technical details of full disk encryption

If I understand you correctly, they are using the same key for all the data and with larger amounts of data statistical analysis becomes feasible
Did I get this right?

Couldn't that be solved by using a root key + salt per block/sector/file/whatever?

I'd still only need the one root key and with every block the actual encryption key changes

I was thinking about perfect forward secrecy and that was the first thing, I could come up with

But, I'm absolutely not a crypto/math guy, so probably I don't know enough to really add something to the discussion/solution...

[–] vapor_body@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I assume this is not something I need to worry about with 1TB drives at all? That's a pretty cool fact about cryptography/data storage I did not know, thanks for sharing

[–] ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Even if quantum cryptography were real, its been proven not to affect symmetric encryption like AES.

Don't use AES-GCM for your block cypher.

[–] vapor_body@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

Got it. I think

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 1 points 3 months ago

At the current rate of development, every city will have its own ~~space heater~~ data center, so with all that computational power available to just any maligned local city government dignitary, you're right to be concerned.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

I remeber times where a 5^1^/~4~ cardboard floppy was enough for all my documents and apps.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

back before the days of hard drives being a standard thing :)

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Youngster. Bet you've never even seen an 8" floppy IRL. And don't get me started on tape or punch cards...

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

I saw Punchcards in my military service and in the payroll office in my job later.

[–] Malgas@beehaw.org 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

51/4 cardboard floppy

Wait, I'm also old enough to remember 5.25" floppies, but I always thought the casings were some sort of flexible plastic. Were some of them just card stock, or were they all some sort of treated paper product?

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

I know these as cardboard case, but certainly with some treatment to make it more resistant.

[–] FudgyMcTubbs@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but it's only about 12tb after you format it. Probably.

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 2 points 3 months ago

With all the data retention and logging requirements being imposed by various governments, your "joke" might not be so far off.