this post was submitted on 25 May 2026
43 points (85.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

48254 readers
754 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

@nostupidquestions is it true that linux cannot run on a laptop without any SSD ?

I had gone inquiring at a couple of local stores regarding restoring my 2gb Ram laptop with 500gb HDD. At both of the places l was told that l need to put in at least 4gb of fresh ram + insert a bare minimum SSD, otherwise windows wouldn't run on it.

When l said that l'd be working on linux, this technician guy told me that even linux has become heavy these days. Not sure what he meant by this, but extra ram burns a lot of holes, not mention about the price of SSD.

So, l just want to make sure. Is it true that modern machines won't work without any SSD or machines with 2gb rams are simply fit for the museum ?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Clearwater@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago

An SSD will improve responsiveness, but it's not strictly necessary. Linux is less HDD/SSD sensitive than Windows, but the difference is still there.

However 2GB is really pushing your limits. You'll get to desktop, but you'll struggle to get a web browser happy with that. If you want to make a headless server out of it, however, that's a perfectly fine amount.

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

The general understanding is that if you can interface a keyboard and display with a russet potato, you can boot and run Linux on it, and run stable.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 hours ago

You do need some form of storage drive, like a modern m.2 or an old platter HDD, for example, because you do need to read and write somewhere.

Having said that, Linux runs on super computers and ancient potatoes, Linux prettyuch could run on anything

[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 day ago

Linux barely needs a CPU.

I'm joking, but if you loaded up a lightweight distro on that it'd probably be fine

[–] CCMan1701A@startrek.website 6 points 1 day ago

That tech has the same teacher that says Americans only shit once a week. https://startrek.website/post/39583672

[–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Considering that Linux existed long before SSDs did...

I first installed Linux in 1993......

[–] mrvictory1@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Even windows 10 will run on 2 gig of ram and hdd.

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

That sounds profoundly unpleasant basically OS bdsm

[–] mrvictory1@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago

I had a VM with that specs, win10 dialed down its ram usage to 1.4g. It took 3 mins to boot and another min to load chrome but was operable after that. Heck even 256m was enough to boot, but certainly not to install.

[–] SuperPengato@scribe.disroot.org 107 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No, this is wrong, Linux can run on an HDD.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 48 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Linux runs on a potato, you may need to be picky about the distro the more resource constrained you are, but that's it.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 14 points 2 days ago

Or may want a bigger potato for convenience.

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

you can actually run it on ram and not disk (see tinycore linux) and have the system faster than even an ssd

It's a laptop so the battery will keep the RAM powered. Very clever and practical, especially for files so confidential you only have one copy − data burglars will be looking for disks. /s

[–] dihutenosa@piefed.social 63 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The 2GB of RAM are going to hit you harder than the HDD, if you intend to run a modern browser on it…

[–] ag10n@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

This, the computer will work great for basic tasks but anything JavaScript heavy will slow things down.

[–] Dultas@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago (3 children)

You don't even need a HDD or SSD. You can just run from the boot media.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Booty ran Linux!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It'll work, but modern apps might be slow as fuck with how they call for data to be loaded from storage if you're using a hard drive. Though I kinda doubt this is a huge problem in programs other than video games.

But also: You ca run Linux from a thumb drive or CD and not even have a storage device at all in the PC.

[–] DigDoug@lemmy.world 49 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Linux can run off an HDD.

Hell, there are versions of Linux that are designed to be run off a USB stick.

[–] imrighthere@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

Running live from usb at the moment.

[–] mech@feddit.org 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

2GB is cutting it short. Not for Linux, that runs fine. But the modern internet doesn't, regardless of what browser you use.
2x2GB RAM shouldn't cost much, that's useless for AI.

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Explaining Computers did a video about running various Linuxes on various low performance machines: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJGf8zVt3MI

As someone who is running a ancient compaq laptop, with 4gb of ram, Debian 13, I can say that it works just fine. Cant do gaming etc with it, but all I do with this is use the browser, IRC and watch a racing stream every weekend. Works perfectly fine with those.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tgr819@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can run some distros from a 2gb USB stick. Not sure what these guys are talking about th.

[–] rodneylives@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I verify this, some years ago when my laptop's hard drive died, I installed Ubuntu Linux from a USB drive (with a live image on it) to a USB drive. It took a while for it to boot but it worked and I used it as my main machine for a couple of months.

But beyond that, there are Linux distros made specifically for running off of external media, Puppy Linux is an example.

[–] NegativeLookAhead@lemmy.ml 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Linux can run on a fucking potato.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It can also run on a celibate potato - it's very flexible

[–] NegativeLookAhead@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 days ago

It has no qualms with the life choices of the potato.

[–] codewizard@hear-me.social 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 19 hours ago

A potato that chooses not to have sex

[–] Zoneflasher@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago

A wordplay.
If there is a "fucking potato" there should also be a "celibate potato"

[–] schwim@piefed.zip 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He's a big box store professional; in other words constantly confidently incorrect.

[–] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 6 points 2 days ago

Also trying to sell you something .. potentially on commission.

[–] CallMeAl@piefed.zip 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you want to run a modern current linux distro on a laptop with only 2gb of ram and 500gb then your options are very limited, but it is possible.

For example. Void Linux with Enlightenment will work. A browser will work ok for basic websites but heavy apps like Gmail will be unusably slow.

If you have no option to upgrade, you can still use a machine with those specs to run linux apps like Abiword, Gnumeric, GIMP, etc very well.

Also, putting in any SSD drive to replace the spinning one is the single best upgrade you can make in terms of performance and longevity on an old laptop.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xcutie@linux.community 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It can even run diskless just over the network. Like Ubuntu diskless booting.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gnergy@piefed.europe.pub 15 points 2 days ago

No, but an SSD really does make the computer a lot faster, no matter the OS.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

No, it is not true

[–] xavier666@lemmy.umucat.day 5 points 2 days ago

If you don't plan to do heavy internet browsing, an HDD is good enough for a light distro. But an SSD will definitely improve the experience.

Regarding RAM, this is a tough one. If you use the right DE + terminal app combo, 2 GB should be good.

[–] Steve@startrek.website 7 points 2 days ago

The low ram is a problem but why not just try it? Its free

[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You can run Linux just fine from 2GB and a HDD, but expect it to be slower. Modern web browsers alone require that much RAM.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 8 points 2 days ago

You can still run a modern Linux from a floppy disk. Run it from a USB drive or a HDD, they are cheap.

https://www.slitaz.org/de/

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I "inherited" my sons netbook, which had 32GB flash, because Windows plus Office wasted 27GB and then wanted to download an 8GB update. I installed Kubuntu with LibreOffice and a number of other packages I needed for the project, and was way below 5GB used.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 5 points 2 days ago

the thing about linux is it depends what you put on it. there are lightweight distros. that being said if you can put an ssd in something do it as nothing outside of more ram when you are maxing it improves it as much as an ssd. I mean im sure if you go back far enough in cpu the drive may no longer be the bottleneck.

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There are versions of Linux that don't need any internal storage at all, eg. Puppy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›