this post was submitted on 25 May 2026
595 points (98.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

39716 readers
1906 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Are these really the people that should be required to work so much? Isn't their job about handling life and death daily? Wouldn't we want exactly these people to come fully rested to work every single day and be fully staffed?

I don't know if there are jobs with similar stakes that are so carelessly staffed and disgustingly paid.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 16 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Who's we? I'm certainly not okay with it

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 hours ago

Yea, "we" the people are not okay with it. "We" the profit driven corporate vampires are okay with it because "profits".

[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Momentum is hard to overcome and it’s been done this way for many many years

The guy who is largely attributed to making the medical residency system so punishingly difficult in terms of hours was coke addict btw. William Stewart Halsted. That was like 1890 and residents didn’t have their hours limited until 2003 (and even then, barely)

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 3 points 9 hours ago

Yeah, I saw that they were "limited" to 80 fucking hours a week (in the US). Quite the limit.

[–] Meatwagon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I'm not okay with it but it's the type of problem that can only be solved by them. They have to go on strike and protest.

[–] stoicmaverick@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

In a vacuum, yes. The problem is that when, say, chip fabricators go on strike, orders for microchips don't get fulfilled on time and the company loses money. When SAG goes on strike for months, movies get delayed, and people usually cheer them on in solidarity. When MEDICAL professionals go on strike en mass, people will die... Quickly, in some cases. People say they support us, and I get a free breakfast once a year at Denny's during Nurse's Week, but nobody's going to cheer on the picket line outside when their dad or grandmother is INSIDE, sitting in their own poop, or not being fed, or having respiratory distress.

You don't go into nursing for the money or easy work. You don't even do it because it's "just a job to pay the bills" because there's way easier ways to make this little money. You do it to because you're the kind of person who is more fulfilled by helping a stranger than by helping yourself, and those people are not ok with risking the life and safety of their patients over a shift differential. A LOT of nurses would cross the line to help them anyway, which would negate the whole effort.. It sucks, but that's it.

I've been a nurse for about 10 years now after getting out of the military, so I have some perspective on this, but I don't know what the way forward is without letting a couple of vulnerable people die to catalyze change in the field.

[–] Meatwagon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I understand, but you guys are setting yourselves on fire to keep society warm.

In Japan when bus drivers go on strike they don't stop the buses, but they stop taking bus fare from riders so the company doesn't get paid. Maybe something involving medical notes so they can't get billing codes.

[–] stoicmaverick@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

That would be the perfect balance, but we're not the ones taking the money like the bus drivers. Even if we were, they can always send a bill later. Messing with the notes would be falsifying medical records, which is one of the Cardinals sins of healthcare... and is also a crime.

[–] reptar@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Hey, regarding false medical notes, I've got a recently discovered whopper of falsehood. I'm going to keep this vague.

Patient suddenly can't walk/stand, has very limited sensation in lower limbs. Goes to ER, spinal cord compression protocol clears and they are admitted. Long weekend of no progress. Patient leaves in a wheel chair, almost no change in symptoms.

Years later, they are collecting medical records for new doc and discover the notes from that stay in the hospital saying that all the symptoms spontaneously resolved before discharge. Wtf

[–] stoicmaverick@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Miracled! I wonder why they would lie about it, unless money?

[–] TheHonourablePierrePoilievre@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] stoicmaverick@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

I'm aware this has happened a few times, but I don't fully understand how. I keep meaning to look into it further, but I've never seen a detailed explanation of who was caring for people while this was going on. Maybe it's buried in one of those articles somewhere, but I don't have time to read through them right now.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

We have to vote. They can't be left alone.

[–] Meatwagon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

We vote, but it's not enough.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Do you? Do we? We currently consistently have about 20-50% of the population in Europe voting for far-right to conservative - parties that don't give 2 shits about medical staff unless they require treatment. And even then, some of them don't care about them because "do your job and stop whining".

And that's just the people that vote. At municipal level the voter participation is abysmal.

[–] Meatwagon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago

It's the same situation in the US. My own mother votes for the most vile Republicans against our interests because she's been so stuffed with hate and tribalism from Fox news all she cares about is that dopamine hit from "my team is winning". No amount of reasoning will overcome that addictive hit of dopamine.

It's a carefully manufactured propaganda machine funded by people with power we could only dream about reaching out from here to the EU.

Even the youth here in the south vote against their interests because abortion and immigrants bad jesus good. Education has been dismantled and even if they knew what was going on our districts are so gerrymandered it probably wouldn't matter.

People need to be inoculated against billionaire propoganda, but how do you do that when they control the media and schools?

We're not going to get anything done done within the system because they control the system. Strikes and violence or extremely disruptive protesting are going to have to happen.

[–] vapordays@leminal.space 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A lot of people have alluded to this already, but I'll simplify.

"We" are not OK with it. "We" are not the ones making the decisions

Hospitals and such are fine with it because they're a business now and not as much involved in the health of the public beyond making sure they can still pay them.

[–] lavander@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 day ago (4 children)

This is actually an interesting question.

They experimented with “office hours” for doctors and patients were dying more than double/triple shift.

This because the information lost during handoff was more valuable than doctors being more tired (and by consequence doing more mistakes).

This is a textbook example of the risks of lost context

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 7 points 10 hours ago

I'd like to see those numbers. I'm not finding clear numbers on shift-length mortality. This meta review (Systematic Review of the Impact of Physician Work Schedules on Patient Safety with Meta-Analyses of Mortality Risk, 2023, DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.06.014 ) says

Limiting all resident physicians to 80-hour work weeks and 28-hour shifts in 2003 was associated with an 11% reduction in mortality (p < 0.001). Limited shift durations and shorter work weeks were also associated with improved patient safety in clinical trials and observational studies not specifically tied to policy changes.

I think we can all agree that a 28 hour shift is fucking insane and that anybody doing such a long shift will not be of sound capacity.

And if hand-offs are killing more people than work hours, then that just means that the hand-off procedures are terrible. I'd want to see what kind of hand-offs are being compared and if hand-off methods have different patient events.

[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

I mean, did they increase staff numbers proportionally to hour reduction or did they just have people go home? Because if it's the latter, then duh.

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

I've also heard that and it makes sense, but if it's a statistic already at this point, can't it serve as a way to improve information storing and handover? I have nothing in common with the medical industry, this is just an outside observation.

[–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

I fully agree with this as far as why they do extended shifts of 12 hours or more. But, OP did say double and triple shifts so they might not be just referencing the longer shifts. In that case it is corporate greed.

[–] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wait until they find out about pilots

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 3 points 10 hours ago

this is bad

this is just as bad

I think we agree

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 19 hours ago

Or public transport operators

[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We're not. But, just like AI, executives with the ideology of rapists don't care about our consent.

Who would've thought that running every industry and business like mini dictatorships would backfire? Thanks capitalism!

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

More like the ideology of slave masters, which includes rapists plus oh so much more.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 day ago

The greatest fear of capitalist administrators is that there might be a slow night in the hospital and a few employees have some down time to take a breath where no "production" is taking place. The shareholders would not be amused. That's why they staff hospitals with the bare minimum, paying them as little as possible and using them as much as possible.

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

‘How does capitalism keep the unemployed on hand?’ you ask.

Simply by compelling you to work long hours and as hard as possible, so as to produce the greatest amount. All the modern schemes of ‘efficiency’, the Taylor and other systems of ‘economy’ and ‘rationalization’ serve only to squeeze greater profits out of the worker. It is economy in the interest of the employer only. But as concerns you, the worker, this ‘economy’ spells the greatest expenditure of your effort and energy, a fatal waste of your vitality.

It pays the employer to use up and exploit your strength and ability at the highest tension. True, it ruins your health and breaks down your nervous system, makes you a prey to illness and disease (there are even special proletarian diseases), cripples you and brings you to an early grave — but what does your boss care? Are there not thousands of unemployed waiting for your job and ready to take it the moment you are disabled or dead?

That is why it is to the profit of the capitalist to keep an army of unemployed ready at hand. It is part and parcel of the wage system, a necessary and inevitable characteristic of it.

It is in the interest of the people that there should be no unemployed, that all should have an opportunity to work and earn their living; that all should help, each according to his ability and strength, to increase the wealth of the country, so that each should be able to have a greater share of it.

But capitalism is not interested in the welfare of the people. Capitalism, as I have shown before, is interested only in profits. By employing less people and working them long hours larger profits can be made than by giving work to more people at shorter hours. That is why it is to the interest of your employer, for instance, to have 100 people work 10 hours daily rather than to employ 200 at 5 hours. He would need more room for 200 than for 100 persons — a larger factory, more tools and machinery, and so on. That is, he would require a greater investment of capital. The employment of a larger force at less hours would bring less profits, and that is why your boss will not run his factory or shop on such a plan. Which means that a system of profit-making is not compatible with considerations of humanity and the well-being of the workers. On the contrary, the harder and more ‘efficiently’ you work and the longer hours you stay at it, the better for your employer and the greater his profits.

You can therefore see that capitalism is not interested in employing all those who want and are able to work. On the contrary: a minimum of ‘hands’ and a maximum of effort is the principle and the profit of the capitalist system. This is the whole secret of all ‘rationalization’ schemes. And that is why you will find thousands of people in every capitalist country willing and anxious to work, yet unable to get employment. This army of unemployed is a constant threat to your standard of living. They are ready to take your place at lower pay, because necessity compels them to it. That is, of course, very advantageous to the boss: it is a whip in his hands constantly held over you, so you will slave hard for him and ‘behave’ yourself.

from Now and After by Alexander Berkman, Chapter 5: Unemployment. Available to read for free here.

Even in countries where healthcare is socialised, they are run "efficiently" like a capitalist business by administrators who care not for healthcare but for finances, "balancing the books", and bean counting.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

The better question is why are the US Labor Laws still shitty. The Scandinavian countries leave everybody in their dust trail and the USA should simply copy them. Good luck finding the politicians, uncorrupt ones, that will change the laws.

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Iirc, here in the UK it’s illegal to ask a doctor or nurse to work s triple shift. I think it should be for doubles as well, excepting major emergencies which involve a sudden influx of patients

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 188 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

No we're not. But generally governments everywhere want to starve the medical industry to make it generate profit for the wealthy. The US is their role model.

Glares at Doug Ford

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 22 points 1 day ago (10 children)

No one does this outside of the USA. It is not at all normal, just like being stuck with the imperial system of measurements.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What are you talking about? I live in Europe and this is standard. I know midwives, nurses, and doctors and they have the worst work schedules. I think in France health workers can even be prohibited from striking. The government declared it an "essential" job and when there aren't enough workers, striking isn't allowed. THey are always understaffed, so they aren't allowed to strike. GReat eh?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] underscores@lemmy.zip 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

my gf is a nurse and it is absolutely bonkers how the healthcare system works at all, shit is very run down and society as a whole needs a lot of shifting for how taxation affects the health care system. tax the fucking rich and make them pay their fair share and siphon that into healthcare.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›