this post was submitted on 26 May 2026
117 points (96.1% liked)

World News

56262 readers
2130 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. military said Monday that it carried out “self-defense” strikes in southern Iran, including on missile launch sites and boats placing mines, even as President Donald Trump said on social media that negotiations were “proceeding nicely.”

The strikes were done “to protect our troops from threats posed by Iranian forces,” but the military was “using restraint during the ongoing ceasefire,” Capt. Tim Hawkins, U.S. Central Command spokesman, said in a statement.

Further details were not immediately available, including more specifics on the threats from Iran and what this means for negotiations. Earlier, Trump said any agreement to end the Iran war should include a requirement for several additional countries, including Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, to join the Abraham Accords, the U.S.-brokered agreements from Trump’s first term aimed at normalizing relations with Israel.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Shamber@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

Self defence, ha, who comes up with dumbass headlines? Maybe this way it doesn't count as a breach of the non-cease fire that's been going on?

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 65 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They literally speak in the language of domestic abusers

[–] noscere@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Its called Newspeak, and it's the official language of Oceania.

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 1 points 21 hours ago

We don’t speak like that in Oceania.

[–] homes@piefed.world 9 points 2 days ago

It’s doubleplus good!

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 4 points 2 days ago

International abusers technically

[–] underThunder@thelemmy.club 13 points 1 day ago

I guess my liberal teachers were completely wrong when they told me that a cease fire meant both sides stopped fighting.

[–] noscere@sh.itjust.works 51 points 2 days ago (1 children)

but the military was “using restraint during the ongoing ceasefire,”

I don't think that word means what you think it means....

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

And, to think, this morning I was reading headlines about how close the US and Iran were to a deal to end the war.

Also I appreciate that the AP took a quote from Capt. Hawkins but did not ask him if he realizes how absurd what he just said actually is.

Really, really sick of this flippy floppy shit.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

And such a great deal it was going to be too, just tremendous!

[–] axh@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

morning I was reading headlines about how close the US and Iran were to a deal to end the war.

The Trumpet needed to sell some stock. Now we are back to the buying phase.

[–] CTDummy@aussie.zone 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The level of blatant double think and newspeak used by this administration is absolutely astounding.

US military says it carried out ‘self-defense’ strikes in Iran, including on missile

The strikes were done “to protect our troops from threats posed by Iranian forces,” but the military was “using restraint during the ongoing ceasefire,”

Journalist should A. Ask members of the administration and military for their definitions on words or B. Just provide definitions in the article itself since A is likely to result in some wishy washy cowardly answer.

“Sir, please define self-defence in context of US attacking Iran? Please define what a CEASEFIRE is.”

Let’s be honest, this all just a distraction to play for time while Israel mounts further operations into neighbouring states. Either sign a declaration that justifies military action against you if you retaliate against future incursion by Israel or we’ll keep attacking you at the expense of the global economy. How the US population/judiciary is just sitting back while it’s government and military siphons their wallet and collapses worldwide supply chains while continually attacking mid-negotiations with “self-defence” attacks is beyond comprehension. All orchestrated by a paedo-in-chief that continually “jokes” about staying in office after his term ends.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 2 points 14 hours ago

They genuinely believe it should only count if it's an actual war crime

Clearly, the attack was a preemptive strike to defend the troops that will be attacked when the ceasefire ends without the US leaving. Or maybe the US assumes because it and its allies in the region have no problem violating ceasefires that Iran also has no problem violating this ceasefire.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Low bar America, that's Israel's classic line.

We're supposed to way "Epic Warmonger Offensive Strike 2: The Storm for Freedom Oil".

Back in my day we'd proudly announce a war as "foreign intervention to protect freedom" and not a "pre-emptive defensive strike"

smh my face, take me back to the good ol' days of the Bushs' invading Iraq.

[–] the_tab_key@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Trump had to molest those children, in self defense

[–] middlemanSI@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Billionaires are self-defending. Poor victims

[–] MonsterMonster@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Give it time and analysis of stock trading during this period might explain the talking up of peace deals followed by sudden military strikes.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 3 points 2 days ago

In defense of Trump's fragile ego, because Iran isn't giving in.