this post was submitted on 26 May 2026
235 points (96.8% liked)

World News

56254 readers
2012 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 hour ago

looks kinda like a tesla.

[–] placebo@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

People are shitting on it as if they were planning to buy one, but now they have to find another EV for $640k lol. I like it.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It looks like every other Ferrari I'm not really sure what's not to like about it. Obviously it should be yellow though, what's with this blue colour scheme?

[–] Threeme2189@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago

It looks like the current Toyota Prius.

[–] horsey@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

I’m so glad that products in this price range are such bad products. I’d be so fucking bummed if a Tesla cost 500K.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 10 hours ago

Ferrari unveils first fully electric car

Not true. Other brands have had fully electric cars way before Ferrari.

/jk I know what it means, I just read it like this the first time and made me giggle.

[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 15 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Looks boring and generic, you are Ferrari ffs... Give me fins, lasers, cool interiors, fucking something to make it stand out. Who wants this?

Jaguar did this too, making boring EVs with none of the signature styling that the brand is famous for, and then proceeded to tank.

[–] kunaltyagi@programming.dev 2 points 1 hour ago

Optimization have sucked away wiggle room everywhere.

The outside looks interesting given the small wiggle room EV have on design. We will not have dramatically unique car designs till battery tech gets 10x energy dense and cars can afford not being shaped like an egg shell

The inside is all Ferrari/Ive choice. There are some cool touches like the display unit. But majority is constricted by supply chain optimization. There's only so much you can deviate before things start costing an arm/leg at the scale Ferrari sells cars. Ferrari can afford custom manufacturing with some manual work but not hand manufacturing everything.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

I find nearly all Ferrari models ugly AF so I'm happy we're not getting another tiny dick monstrosity but instead just another generic ugly EV.

[–] backalleycoyote@lemmy.today 7 points 2 hours ago

They know what we want, but they deny us at every turn.

[–] TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id 22 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

That's a nice looking Peugeot.

[–] nlgranger@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (3 children)

Was thinking Honda but I agree that it fails to fit the design lineage of Ferrari.

[–] wasabi@feddit.org 1 points 2 hours ago

That's because it wasn't designed by ferrari but by the former chief designer of Apple.

[–] HowDawg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I'm with ya on the Honda vibes. Really disappointed by the design.

[–] kungen@feddit.nu 1 points 2 hours ago

I think they were referring to designs like the Honda e 😅

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 12 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

10/10 would have beckoned Barbie to go celebrating

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 61 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

The sports car manufacturer's cycle of business:

  1. Lose revenue due to EV competition.
  2. Design EV that looks like a cotton candy/kid's toys version of your other cars.
  3. EV sells poorly.
  4. Scrap EV plans and return to non-EV lineup.
  5. Go back to 1.
[–] Tiral@lemmy.world 18 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I'm genuinely curious about the reliability. I've been lucky enough to own a lot of cars in my life. I will tell you every somewhat modern/modern exotic car I've owned has been an absolute piece of over priced shit beyond "it looks and sounds cool''. I kid you not probably every other time I drove my Lamborghini Aventador with 5k miles some stupid shit would break, radiator hoses, electrical problems, misfires and they all cost stupid amounts of money to fix. While my 2002 Camry has 185k miles with only regular maintenance and I'd feel comfortable driving it across the US.

I get they're meant to be looked at ect, but if you can't design a radiator hose that lasts over 2 years and 5k miles you've got a serious engineering problem. Hell, I had a 68' mustang that still has the the OEM from the factory before I replaced it and it technically still was fine. Absolutely ridiculous, these things are like a bunch of expensive parts just bolted together like a 2nd grader did it.

Sorry for the rant. These cars are one of the few things that ligit get me pissed as an automotive lover.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 1 points 56 minutes ago* (last edited 43 minutes ago)

Isn’t that just Italian manufacturing quality. Same with how McLarens and Range Rovers aren’t very reliable despite the high price tag that‘s just because British manufacturing is generally trash. (Though Rolls Royce is the exception especially their jet engine production department)

Like Porsche builds reliable sports cars.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 1 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

I wonder if it possible to design a maintenance free car, and if the market would even reward it.

It'd take the consumers a decade to even notice that they didn't need any maintenance.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 1 points 51 minutes ago

They probably can build an EV that is maintenance free, except for the batteries wearing down. Electric engines are very reliable because they are relatively simple.

[–] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 hour ago

Toyota has done this but they stopped making the original line of those unkillable pickup trucks long ago

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 52 points 20 hours ago (17 children)

Is it possible to make an EV that doesn't look like a dorks version of a futuristic car? Just make it look normal and people will buy it.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

It was only a concept but I thought the DS Survolt looked wicked back in the day.

Or they could just, you know, design the same as a gasoline car and use some molding tricks if volume is a concern.

[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Sp00kyB00k@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

And the renault 4, renault twingo. Seriously Renault has been doing a stellar job.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

There are some fundemental problem with making an EV look like a "normal car" though.

EVs are more dense than their ICE counterparts. This means that the whole vehicle needs more structure to protect it in a rollover than an ICE of the same size. Thicker frames and pillars in a smaller car end up making it look bulgy and weird.

I think (but not 100% sure) that EVs are required to have extra protection for the battery to prevent them from getting punctured and having a "thermal runaway" event. This makes the cars even more pudgy.

The energy source and propulsion methods have changed, which will affect their design of the cars. Much in the same way early jet airplanes looked like regular airplanes with jets attached, EVs started as regular cars with electric motors. We're currently in the weird transition phase of EV design. We're seeing the EV equivalent of the P80 Shooting star, and maybe starting to get into some cars that are akin to the F86 Sabre. We have a long way to go until the design catches up to the propulsion.

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago

I worked at a lithium ion battery company for 11 years. If anything, the switch to EVs gives you even more options for body shape/type. The batteries are located at the bottom of the frame, and the motors are hub motors located at the wheels. It gives the vehicle a lower center of gravity, and gives the body designers artistic freedom to make it look however they like. I don't accept the argument that it has to look dorky. The original Tesla Roadster was just a modified Lotus Elise, and it looked basically bone stock. There is no need for the front to be loaded up with a huge motor, there is a reason a lot of EVs have a "frunk"...there is just a bunch of extra room. No need for an oil reservoir, or a transmission, or hydraulic brake lines and reservoir, or any other fluids.

[–] cornshark@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

Teslas look pretty normal

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] facelessbs@lemmy.world 24 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

I feel the I8 doesn’t look bad at all.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 66 points 22 hours ago (10 children)

Like, they just couldn't be bothered to make it good looking?

[–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think it looks bad.

[–] Threeme2189@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

Yeah, it just looks generic. It should look like a fuckin g Ferrari though!

[–] No1@aussie.zone 2 points 10 hours ago

They didn't even make it red so we'd know it was a Ferrari lmao

[–] grue@lemmy.world 36 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

The stupidest thing is how Ferrari has historically gone to great lengths to make their cars sleek and pointy despite the need to accommodate big-ass radiators and engine intakes, yet just when using an electric drivetrain makes 'sleek and pointy' easy for them, they come out with this boxy shit instead!

And even worse, it's a sedan (which Ferrari has never made before). WTF.


Clearly, what happened here is that the bean-counters insisted that Ferrari needed to diversify into new market segments (both more practical cars and EVs) but somebody at the top hated the idea, so they did it in the most sabotaged, begrudging way possible. They didn't have the courage to make a proper two-seat electric sports car.

[–] TwodogsFighting@lemdro.id 5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

Ferrari had in fact made several sedans.

[–] nlgranger@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

And a station wagon / estate.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

First sentence of the article:

The new model departs from the look of typical Ferraris as the Italian brand's first ever five-seater,

I guess maybe I shouldn't have read that and assumed. I knew they had 2+2 two-door coupes, but didn't know they'd made any four-seaters with four doors.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›