Noite_Etion

joined 2 years ago
[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 43 points 4 days ago (11 children)

I feel like Charlie Kirk should be nominated for a Darwin award. Dude literally campaigned for guns, said it was Ok that some people die from gun violence and then got shot while sitting under a tent labelled "prove me wrong".

[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Those crazy left-wing reporters keep making fun of me, who knows what evil heights they will reach unless we stop them.

[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 71 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maps without New Zealand

[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A safer city is nice and all, but what about the economy hmm!?

[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

China has decided you are wrong

[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 79 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Who called you and when, and what did this imaginary Canadian tell you...

Also the idea that Canada that wants to join America just because of the tariffs introduced by America is retarded.

[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Yeah! And what did Australia do... Oh wait.

[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

~~leaders~~ fascists these days just label their enemies as terrorists and they just get to do whatever they want. Apparently we are all Hamas now.

[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 41 points 3 months ago

Education is a threat to fascism. They want dumb people who will buy what they are selling.

[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 170 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (10 children)

Tighty whities

Cause they are tight fitting and white.

[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh yes, the guy who responds to being called out for bad behaviour by stalking the person they've decided to pick a fight with and downvoting them in entirely unrelated threads

Wtf are you talking about? You have been imagining an argument with me this whole time... You know karma doesn't exist on lemmy.

Go argue with some who actually want to argue with you, im moving on now.

[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world -5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

You came into this conversation with an argumentative tone, don't put that on me.

What are you talking about lol? I was giving the article shit... Did you take that personally, I mean have you been imagining an argument between us this whole time..?

Also how do I come into a conversation with an argumentive tone when I started this comment chain (there wasn't even a conversation yet) I just gave my opinion on this article and you are already triggered. If anything you came in with an argumentive tone when you replied to me.

The article presents data and shares anecdotes that do a good job of personalising that data. Why are you accusing it of inventing problems when its data pretty solidly supports that.

The headline is that kids can't swim anymore, that alone is a sensationalist title used to garter clicks, and the use of one women's experience to justify this title is poor journalism imo.

If you wanted to criticise the source of the data or the methodology by which the conclusions were drawn from the data, that would be one thing (and we could evaluate the merits of that kind of reasoning in context), but you didn't...you just claimed they were presenting anecdotes that create fear unsupported by data, despite the fact that that couldn't be further from the truth.

I agreed with the data several times, what I disagreed with was the presentation of the data by this article. The RLSS has done good research, and then the Herald took some anecdotal takes and extrapolated it out to "kids cannot swim anymore". This in my opinion skews the facts as most people don't read past headlines these days and will take shit at face value.

You really need to take this down a notch, I am happy to continue this conversation and discuss our opinions, but if you just reply with more accusations I'll just move on. Please chill.

view more: next ›