this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2025
710 points (99.2% liked)

Not The Onion

18978 readers
1669 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/57149491

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 4 points 45 minutes ago

They should place the bullet in glass case with his exact words about sacrificing children for the 2nd Amendment. The last sentence should be, "Yes, he was a sick racist shitbag.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 4 points 45 minutes ago

Money was vacuumed from the gullible, of course it was there.

[–] JoeTheSane@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

That is fucking ghoulish.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

"You could get shot here, too! Just book the full package!"

On the other hand, let's celebrate the fact that Charlie Kirk has not sputtered anything racist in the last months. It's a new record for him!

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 43 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The left was celebrating the assassination of Charlie Kirk!

— the very people who made this tent

[–] Isolde@lemmy.world 18 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I always wondered who would take selfies at Auschwitz and now I know.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 19 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Auschwitz was the scene of despicable horrors, though. not really the same thing

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 2 points 44 minutes ago

People do it though. Walk around taking peace sign selfies and posing on the tracks. Ridiculously disrespectful and tacky as fuck.

[–] Isolde@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago

I see what you did there. Don’t disagree.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago

I feel like people who support this type of politics are emotionally blunted and stunted. They'll use his death as a tool of martyrdom for their movement, which this is a prime example of, but I don't really feel like anyone loved him or mourned him in any genuine sense. I think it's because they don't really have any attachment to anyone in a real sense. I'm not saying that other people of other beliefs don't use grief as a performative tool either, but I feel like most of the problem with conservatives at the root of it all is blunted emotions.

[–] tooLikeTheNope@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 hours ago

peak right winger mental gymnastic

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Jesus dude this is so disrespectful. And this is someone they actually like.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

He was a shit-bag, so its disrespect he deserved.

[–] Noite_Etion@lemmy.world 40 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

I feel like Charlie Kirk should be nominated for a Darwin award. Dude literally campaigned for guns, said it was Ok that some people die from gun violence and then got shot while sitting under a tent labelled "prove me wrong".

[–] SchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (4 children)

he had children

EDIT: which means he cannot get the Darwin award. this is not defending him.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 15 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Everyone always screws that up. The Darwin award doesn't just mean the person died from their own stupidity, it means they did the world a favor and removed themselves from the gene pool before passing on their genes. By that note, people who are unable to reproduce also cannot be eligible for the award.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I'm a parent too, and that's exactly why I am glad his disgusting voice was silenced in the most public and ironic way possible.

[–] SchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Sorry for ambiguity, I meant this in the context of Darwin award

[–] Zink@programming.dev 2 points 6 hours ago

Ah yeah good edit, I wasn't even considering that you could have meant it that way.

I decided to go look up the rules in order to contribute something more useful to this discussion, and it turns out that the mere presence of offspring does not disqualify one from the award!

Given their reasoning, I think Kirk would qualify. And given that his whole brand was about spreading stupid dangerous ideas to everybody's kids including his own, and then he died in a spectacularly ironic and public way, I think he should actually win one!

https://darwinawards.com/rules/rules.children.html

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

I mean, maybe. Depends on when JD got his couch nob in there.

[–] umbrellacloud@leminal.space 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

So did John Wayne Gacy, what's your point?

Charlie Kirk's comment about "some gun deaths being necessary" was in response to a comment about school shootings involving small children, wasn't it? I don't remember exactly, why don't you look it up yourself?

[–] SchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Darwin award is for people who make themselves unable to reproduce.

I need to edit the comment in order not to sound like I'm defending him.

[–] umbrellacloud@leminal.space 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah sorry I'm just used to people immediately jumping to defend this guy and make any negative comment about him illegal

[–] SchwertImStein@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 hours ago

no problem, I didn't think enough before posting

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

It didn't prove him wrong, it just made him one of the "some people."

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.world 18 points 9 hours ago

What a fitting memorial to Charlie Kirk's final words, when he said we shouldn't care so much about gun violence because so many of the people getting shot aren't worth getting upset over. That's an important lesson in irony.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 9 points 9 hours ago

A death cult in this day and age. Can you imagine?

[–] telllos@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago

Prove me wrong, LOL.

[–] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Did they also sell the “Freedom” shirt he was wearing while being shot?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Real missed merch opportunity if they didn't. Would have been disrespectful to his memory if they didn't cash in.

[–] remotedev@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 hours ago

With the blood stains added, of course

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

This would be a lot less weird if ck wasn't a fucking horrible human being.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 11 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I think it would still be weird. But then I have a photo of my kid smiling in front of the limo JFK died in (at the Henry Ford museum), so maybe I’m wrong.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

People have monuments and shrines and stuff all the time, so part of it isn't that weird. It would still be weird how people are treating it though. Taking selfies and shit. It's like the dumbest, most non-self aware people's hot takes, crystallized and evolved into a political party.

But if you believe what he was doing was right, and actually listened to him "debate (uncomfortable public verbal conflict logically) is good", then a public selfie under the tent does make a lot more sense.

Unfortunately for them, THEY are the ones that need the growth, but treat it as a sneaky way to proliferate "values" and "ideas" in a really messed up little chapel. Spreading your worldview under a tent is as old as history, all religions basically do it. So it probably felt holy to a lot of stupid people.

[–] CaptainBlinky@lemmy.myserv.one 26 points 17 hours ago

It's a death cult. Makes sense for them to have a shrine to death.

[–] regedit@lemmy.zip 47 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Can we just start publicly call them weird to their faces again? Please!?!? It worked and started to break through their silly imaginary world where they own limbs at a convention for weirdos and kiddie-fiddlers! I don't know why they stopped!

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 1 points 11 minutes ago* (last edited 7 minutes ago)

Walz started the trend and it resonated with and energized the base so much to the point where he surged to the spotlight from relative obscurity in a very short amount of time and ended up getting picked as running mate by the Harris campaign.

But then Harris's campaign almost immediately pivoted to the classic strategy of, "damn our base, they're going to vote for us anyway so instead let's appeal hard to the right", despite that consistently being a losing strategy over the last decade or so.

So they told Walz to shut up, just stand there and look pretty and cut it out with the "weird" stuff, it'll alienate voters on the right. Turns out instead they just killed all the momentum growing within their own base while at the same time failing to win the votes of the weirdo cult members wearing ear pads in solidarity with their God king.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 8 points 15 hours ago

Got to be SEEN showing you are on the "right" side and care.

Its like having to pay a tithe to the social media machine in the form of cringey posts that confirm the message desired.

load more comments
view more: next ›