For the most part, not that I've found. Occasionally here.
this post was submitted on 27 May 2026
-14 points (31.6% liked)
Ask Lemmy
39716 readers
1906 users here now
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com.
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Where we take each others points seriously, demonstrate we understand them, and then address them?
This isn't how human discussions work, unfortunately. At least not outside of formal debate clubs.
Humans in general use language to understand or be understood. If you make an assertion and people "ignore" it by trolling, they are expressing that they have disdain for your position--which implies at least a coarse understanding of it.
I've found that essentially any place on the internet can lead to worthwhile discussions, if you simply practice the habits of ignoring the trolls and engaging with those who respond to you.
I'm not talking about trolling.
I'm specifically looking for discussions where Intellectually Honesty is practiced because that's how the people involved would like to engage in discussion.
edit: typos
While I generally a fan of Wikipedia as a way to explain obscure terms people may not be familiar with, in this case I don't think your linked article reflects a distinct concept worth seeking.
People in general are honest in their discussions. Asserting that you want to have a dedicated space for "intellectual honesty" asserts that it isn't workable in the extant communities, and implies that the rest of us are being "intellectually dishonest" if we are "partisan" or do not pretend our beliefs do not affect how we state facts.
The internet writ large, and social media in particular, is neither a scientific journal nor academic forum nor business back-room. And biases always affect how we state facts.
Yes, there are communities like that. I know of two or three, like you said, focused on specific topics.
But the key to joining a community like that is to demonstrate elsewhere that you are already someone who will participate seriously and civilly in discussion. There's no shortcut for this. Everyone wants to be listened to, but not everyone wants to listen. The people curating these spaces are only looking to add new users who are proven qualities.
Appreciate what you are asking for but the internet is a shit-slinging fest and when you add upvotes and downvotes into the mix, a lot of people try to present the popular opinion. You’d need to have the discussions in person.
Someone would have to enforce that. Which means they'd have to lay down specific rules to determine what's honest and real and serious. I wouldn't want to be the one to do any of that, especially not without a group of other mods to share the inevitable blame.
I think you just described moderation in general :)
Well, there is a difference between a community dedicated to serious discussion and one for, say, shitposting. The shitposting mod can let a lot more slide that wouldn't fly if you want to achieve deep insights through conversation. And those are just the two ends of a spectrum.
Yes and I'm learning that many serious discussion communities are invite only to make moderation easier.
Tildes might be what you're looking for. It's invite-based, which helps to keep the level of discourse at a somewhat decent level.
There are a few places like that still left on the internet, I don't really want to mention them by name since they probably like to stay that way not that they would get a huge influx from here but regardless. I will say, I have no had any luck making good friends on the internet after decades of use, but I'm not good at it either and I have a tendency to drift away. Forums are a good place to start though as mentioned.
Socially, it is much better to look for a small group of friends or hobby group for this in IRL.....not online.
If you want to do this more seriously then you'd be looking for some academic community.....a university or bunch of professionals who are involved in an area of your interest who are willing to talk to you. You would need to have a pretty serious knowledge base to be involved at this level.
If you're dealing with people online, then you're dealing with The Public. There's only so much you can expect.
If you want to do this more seriously then you'd be looking for some academic community.....a university or bunch of professionals who are involved in an area of your interest who are willing to talk to you.
Those are called "journals."
Depends what the topic is, but generally you want forums. Forums are more geared to this. Reddit (and Lemmy, which is based on the Reddit model) tried to replicate and decentralise forums (whereas on a forum you have a small set of mods and an admin or two; on Reddit, each sub would have its own mods; Lemmy improves upon this with instances (for example, the one I'm on is more freedom of speech/anarchy)), but forums still exist. A lot of them have died out. One forum that tries to take itself pretty seriously is Ars Technica's. They can be a bit of a clannish bunch and they're a little distrusting of newcomers, but some of them have been there for 20 years.
https://arstechnica.com/civis/
Worth noting, when they say forum, they lean pretty heavily into the original definition of a gathering place where people would gather and talk, so there are similar themes throughout the site. But, if you like tech stuff and science, that's their thing (their name is Latin for "The Art of Technology").
I'm not a member. I was, a very long time ago. I had issues with some long standing members and they basically ran me off. But it was like 10-12 years ago. So who knows. Things change. People change. And I don't even remember what I was called then. But, for what it's worth, I would imagine if Arsians have a social network they use, it's probably Lemmy/Piefed, though I imagine it's more Reddit.
I don't think there is. Way too easy to troll people and argue in bad faith.
Create your own sub and mod it how you like. Serious people will come.