this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
220 points (98.7% liked)

World News

1290 readers
82 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be a decent person
  2. No spam
  3. Add the byline, or write a line or two in the body about the article.

Other communities of interest:

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 78 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is EXACTLY why we ELIMINATED my Child's EDUCATION! So we can Afford THIS!

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

And food and health assistance for the most at-risk Americans.

(You do know our tax dollars still go to this when "the poors" get arrested or die in the streets, right?)

Fuck this country.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 77 points 2 months ago (3 children)

And since the plane gets transferred to Trump's actual ownership after his term, Trump gets a free $2billion plane..

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 40 points 2 months ago

The military is already ordered to strip it again when they are don't with it, meaning he gets all the work done for free.

[–] paperazzi@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

That's ok because he won't ever leave office again so technically the people will still own it

/s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 40 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I wonder how many better planes could be built for that price.

[–] evidences@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago

Well considering the current contract for the two 747s Boeing is currently converting for the government is a fixed cost contract that's already paid for technically infinite I guess?

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The Air Force awarded Boeing a $3.9 billion contract in 2018 for two new Air Force One planes, updated VC-25B models based on the newer 747-8I. Delivery originally was slated for 2024 but currently they are looking at 2027.

[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I guess not quite 1, but at least it isn't decades old. Though, who knows, government projects like this have a habit of ballooning in cost.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That was a fixed price contract for the new planes. Boeing will have to eat any cost overruns. Their CEO has Already been complaining about it.

The days of cost plus contracting with companies like Boeing are essentially gone luckily. Now that the practice is decently well known by the public, it can't just be hidden as a cost of private sector business anymore like they used to claim.

A decently large reason for that is SpaceX's dramatically cheaper space launch costs, even with iterative design principles resulting in a lot of "waste" designs and products being destroyed or never used. Their contracts were fixed prices through NASA commercial programs so they never received contracts cost plus the way companies like Boeing did, so they actually optimized to minimize their costs. They proved in the real world that cost plus wasn't necessary for those contracts at all, and Boeing has been one of the worst hit by that.

[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I meant the updating of the Qatari plane could balloon to equal the cost of one of the newer planes.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh possibly. Not sure the government has even signed those contracts yet at this point.

The one surprising thing is that the Qatari jet is actually a 747-8 model like the two new contracted planes. So I suppose it could technically be outfitted as a new Air Force One, then only one of the new airframes finished and outfitted, and then gut this to finish the second new airframe, leaving a gutted 747-8 for Trump.

But we know that's not what will happen.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

It will cost more to strip it, verify parts, retrofit and rebuild it and sweep the thing for malicious items/bugs and/or bombs.

Israel is making indiscernible beeper bombs and this retard accepted a 485,000lb potential bomb.

[–] DrDickHandler@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

You are missing the point. They are using these defence contracts to funnel themselves money.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Oh look. Another violation of our Constitution.

Hope everyone is well aware that our Constitution is basically toilet paper now.

The collapse of our democracy is imminent.

[–] j_elgato@leminal.space 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Imminent?

Hmm.. I think it has already happened and we are just in there awkward lull as we await the consequences to start rolling in...

[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is what the enemies of American democracy want you to think so that you stop voting, stop fighting, stop caring, and just submit.

[–] j_elgato@leminal.space 1 points 2 months ago

That American Democracy has failed is debatable.

That it can be revived is not.

I would not advocate surrender to authoritarianism - but I would urge we all take an unflinchingly look at the systemic failures within our existing governmental system that allowed it to take root and (ultimately) to come to power. We are better equipped to resist after assessing our current situation and understanding how it was that we came to be here.

[–] Twig@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is there a list of every time he's violated the US Constitution?

[–] Tronn4@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 1 points 2 months ago
[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 31 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

for scale ... how much is that in little girl dolls ?

30 dolls ? 100 dolls ?

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 6 points 2 months ago

Ten million

[–] doctortofu@reddthat.com 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

See, that's what government efficiency looks like!

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

trump the ever moron, thought he was getting a steal, when in fact that 400million jet had a very expensive upkeep. it was mostly like costing QATARIS to even having sit in an airplane hanger in thier country before "gifting" it to trump.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

spend our money. to corporations. for this shit.

[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

Hey, if you can figure out a cheaper way for the president to accept bribes they'll be happy to ignore it

[–] svc@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 13 points 2 months ago

How I learned to stop worrying and love the grift

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

OP, I think you just linked ABC's home page instead of the article

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

The art of the deal

[–] 20cello@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Hahaha, haha, American people won't allow this, they have guns

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Can we please stop all planes that use fossil fuels?

[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

i wish, batteries are still too heavy to replace jet fuel, hydrogen could work weight wise, but too low density and you just don't have space in an airplane (you could design one but it'll be too big and have too much drag).

best possibility for now is biofuels. basically plug and play.

better yet, replace all major overland routes with high speed rail, much cheaper than flying anyways.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (11 children)

not realistically with our current technology

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

So now I guess Trump really is a billionaire?

load more comments
view more: next ›