this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
482 points (96.9% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40168 readers
3429 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ashenone@lemmy.ml 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Glad I made it to the end. Totally worth it

[–] Uebercomplicated@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago

This is an evil comment

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

Does a nude woman jiggling down a beach not count as NSFW anymore!?

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

It took me a while, but the payoff when it finally gets there is great.

[–] Big_Boss_77@fedinsfw.app 51 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Reminds me of the conundrum of being unable to measure shoreline

[–] Akasazh@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Alan Davies (of qi fame) once made a documentary where he tried to measure the length of a piece of string, the shoreline issue also comes up.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00whwmc

[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)
  1. Imagine an island (e.g: Bermuda, Hook Island, Sardinia, etc)

  2. Draw a square or rectangle approximating all of the land not currently touching water (e.g: All pixels must not contain water)

  3. Draw a larger red square encompassing the smaller red square or rectangle.

  4. Subtract any brown, green, or "land" pixels, and add them to the total count of Box_1.

  5. Remove green, blue and other "water" pixels from Box_2.

  6. Your final result will be a red outline precisely mapping the coastline of the island in question. You can now measure distance by taking pixels and multiplying by the scale of the zoom-distance (parralax).

[–] mushroomman_toad@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This measurement is a factor of pixel size. As resolution increases and pixel width approaches 0, the shoreline length approaches infinity.

Though I guess you'd eventually run into the problem of clearly defining the shoreline once you're distinguishing between water molecules and grains of sand. is the water between the sand molecules part of the ocean? How concave is the boundary on the stretches between sand grains?

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

And of course, it's dynamic as tides and waves change it. And how does wet sand due to rain play into it - we're now having to differentiate based on salinity of water.

[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh that's funny. I see what you're doing 😆

Philosophers are no longer permitted on the beach 🚧 (/s)

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

Over a very broad range of scales (like, from the scale of 10km down to the scale of 1mm) the number of boundary pixels of a natural shape like an island increases according to a power law as you increase the resolution.

This means that your approach doesn't give you an objective value because it depends so strongly on the resolution.

This way of computing the length of a boundary leads to the concept of box-counting dimension. When you increase the resolution of the pixel grid, you'll get a larger number of pixels on the boundary. Keep refining the grid many times. Graph the log of the total number of pixels against the log of the number of boundary pixels. The box counting dimension is the slope of that graph.

Why would we call this "dimension"? Because if you do this to a line, the slope is 1, and if you do it to a square, the slope is 2.

More information: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal_dimension?wprov=sfla1

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Just get a small enough ruler either you'll measure the shoreline and disprove calculus or you'll solve quantum physics.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Well, if you get a small enough ruler you will already disprove quantum physics. No need to use it for anything.

[–] Klear@piefed.world 2 points 1 day ago

At best you'll disprove shoreline.

[–] MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 days ago
[–] Aarkon@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fractal shorelines. Always a pleasure to behold.

[–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

hmm yes this beach is made of beach

[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Son of a beach

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

No I can't see it. Anyone willing to enlighten me?

Edit: nm, didn't realize it was a gif.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Same here.-

[–] Makeshift@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 days ago

This successfully hurt my brain.

[–] Imke@feddit.org 14 points 2 days ago
[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] MathiasTCK@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

This made me research the coastline paradox

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coastline_paradox

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 8 points 1 day ago

infinite real estate! how practical :D

[–] SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

damn. only found out its a gif due to other comments, for me its just a static image

[–] Phantaloons@piefed.zip 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

computer, enhance photo...

ENHAAAAAAAAAAA

[–] Zier@fedia.io 9 points 2 days ago

It's Fractal Beach, DUH!

Alright….. I fell for that.

[–] Admetus@sopuli.xyz 10 points 2 days ago

Infuriating but pretty cool

Crime shows; Pull up the satilight view. Zoom in. There, what's that spec? Enhance. There's our guy, move out!

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

Thanks I hate it

[–] Misty@lemy.lol 3 points 1 day ago

I'm still squinting to see...

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Those are turtles!

[–] Glitterkoe@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Unexpected Dumpert.nl