this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
56 points (70.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40215 readers
3668 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 34 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Prescriptively adhering to a communist ideology: ❌

Prescriptively adhering to a capitalist ideology: ❌

Structuring a government to be free of corruption and able to efficiently and rationally respond to problems: ✅

[–] Binette@lemmy.ml 3 points 49 minutes ago

Except the rational way to respond to our current issues is communism. Especially compared to the field of economics, communism and dialectical materialism is closer to what is observed in studies relating to work, living conditions and resource management.

[–] delightful@lemmy.world -1 points 53 minutes ago (1 children)

That's just well regulated capitalism with strong socialist policies.

[–] chortle_tortle@mander.xyz 3 points 14 minutes ago

mfs will say "we don't need communist or capitalism, we need a new separate third thing!" then describe Dengism.

[–] NONE_dc@lemmy.world 59 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

As a Venezuelan currently living in Venezuela, I have always believed that the problem is not so much communism / socialism, but rather the incompetence and corruption of our leaders.

In fact, I could argue that if it weren’t for my country’s socialist policies, I and many people would have died of disease (COVID) or starvation.

[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 5 points 44 minutes ago (1 children)

I would think, as a Venezuelan living in Venezuela, your main problem would be the USA.

[–] NONE_dc@lemmy.world 5 points 27 minutes ago

It always has been...

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 45 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

If all communism is soviet, then all capitalism is colonialism and chattel slavery.

[–] MushuChupacabra@piefed.world 3 points 36 minutes ago

Fun fact about NATO and the Warsaw Pact:

Only one of these two entities had a fuckton of defection to the other side.

People wanted to escape from behind the Iron Curtain.

Imagine having to take extraordinary measures and worrying constantly whenever your sports teams, musicians, dancers go play or perform outside of your sphere of influence, because of the high risk of them defecting.

That's exactly what winning social conditions doesn't generate.

[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 41 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The problem is always about authority. The system that enforces the rules is more important than the rules themselves

Communism typically fails because the systems that manage it are corruptible. Capitalism has the opposite problem. If there are no rules surrounding what industry is allowed to do, they will always choose the most profitable thing.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 2 points 20 minutes ago

The systems that manage capitalism are also corruptible.

Any time it is possible for one person to control more resources than others, there will be corruption.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 3 points 32 minutes ago* (last edited 25 minutes ago)

The few attempts at communism have nothing on the all life on earth destroying efficiency of runaway capitalism. Literally billions of people and animals have been wiped out with colonialism and capitalism. We really need to start getting more enlightened on various forms of government that have been tried and build a better constitution after the inevitable revolution otherwise these pedophile ghouls will just build us another cage. Also, it’s very important we start identifying narcissists, wealth hoarders and psychopaths as mentally ill and removing their ability to gain any levers of power. It seems like a lot of failed systems were destroyed because narcissists and psychopaths were rewarded for their mental illness. https://coupsaveamerica.substack.com/p/capitalisms-deadly-legacy-hundreds

[–] culprit@lemmy.ml 3 points 32 minutes ago (1 children)

https://www.mediafax.ro/english/most-romanians-consider-communist-regime-rather-a-good-thing-inscop-poll-shows-23584386

A recent poll conducted by INSCOP Research for the Institute for the Investigation of Communist Crimes and the Memory of the Romanian Exile (IICCMER) reveals that more than half of Romanians (55.8%) believe that the communist regime was "rather a good thing for Romania."

What was grandma doing in the 1940s?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romania_in_World_War_II

[–] delightful@lemmy.world 1 points 19 minutes ago* (last edited 19 minutes ago) (1 children)

“Totuși, majoritatea respondenților recunosc că accesul la alimente era limitat, libertatea era mai puțină, accesul la funcții de conducere era permis doar membrilor de partid sau că au fost comise abuzuri și chiar crime. Mai exact, 94,4% dintre cei care au auzit despre subiect, susțin că anumite alimente se cumpărau pe cartelă în cantități limitate, iar altele nu se găseau aproape deloc în magazine. 93,7% recunosc că programul TV era limitate la câteva ore pe zi, iar 88,6% își amintesc restricționarea călătoriilor în afara granițelor. În ceea ce privește abuzurile și sistemul membrilor de partid, 72,6% dintre respondenți sunt de acord cu afirmația potrivit căreia „sute de mii de români au fost omorâți și torturați în închisorile comuniste”, iar 71,9% spun că accesul la orice funcție de conducere era permis doar membrilor de partid.”

“However, most respondents admit that access to food was limited, freedom was less, access to leadership positions was allowed only to party members, or that abuses and even crimes were committed. Specifically, 94.4% of those who heard about the subject claim that certain foods were purchased on the card in limited quantities, and others were almost not available in stores at all. 93.7% admit that TV programming was limited to a few hours a day, and 88.6% remember restrictions on travel abroad. Regarding abuses and the party membership system, 72.6% of respondents agree with the statement that “hundreds of thousands of Romanians were killed and tortured in communist prisons,” and 71.9% say that access to any leadership position was allowed only to party members.”

https://www.digi24.ro/stiri/actualitate/politica/paradoxul-nostalgiei-comuniste-romanii-spun-ca-inainte-era-mai-bine-desi-recunosc-lipsa-libertatii-si-abuzurile-sondaj-inscop-3337327

[–] culprit@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 minutes ago* (last edited 4 minutes ago)

Still better than capitalism according to them though.

And I'm sure the polling methodology by the Institute for the Investigation of Communist Crimes and the Memory of the Romanian Exile was completely nonbiased, and respondents still view it more positively.

So what was grandma doing in the 1940s?

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 3 points 32 minutes ago

After informing this lady I know her grandpa was a CIA plant and deserved to be shot for protesting:

[–] Catgrass@lemmy.world 1 points 8 minutes ago

Typical reactionary Pole

[–] AccoSpoot1@lemmy.world 3 points 46 minutes ago
[–] renzhexiangjiao@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] delightful@lemmy.world 1 points 52 minutes ago

If facts = bait, then yes.

[–] red_tomato@lemmy.world 8 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

A tankie’s dialogue options:

  1. It wasn’t real communism
  2. It was great. She’s just influenced by US propaganda
  3. It would’ve worked if it weren’t for US sabotage
  4. Capitalism is way worse!!
[–] felixwhynot@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

USA can have one Socialism as a treat (it seems to be going well enough in Canada)

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 10 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I was thinking about this yesterday, isn't our "retirement" system a sort of reverse socialist policy? It's socialist policy for corporations.

You pay a corporation so they can benefit (stocks) until you are old enough to retire and then pray there is money left to take back out to retire with as opposed to just fucking paying taxes and then the government would give you a retirement distribution when it's time...

[–] musicalphysics@discuss.online 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

If you buy stocks that money goes to the previous stock holder, which is most generally not the corporation.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Makes sense. For the sake of simplicity and to help my understanding say a company sells 100 stocks at $1, people buy and sell them amongst themselves after the full 100 have already been purchased causing the price to increase to $2, the company only ever took in $100 as it was the initial sale even though there is potentially $200 out there?

If that is the case then why do we even talk about "billionaires" based on their company stock prices?

[–] noodles@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 hour ago

I think their stock valuations are typically of the stock they own rather than total stock. Bezos for instance owns 8% of Amazon.

[–] delightful@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago

Socialist policies =/= socialism.

[–] UkrainianBull@reddthat.com 1 points 53 minutes ago

Fuggen librul nozi it wasn't rael communism

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Here they come!