this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
488 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

85515 readers
4276 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

“Users may hate”

Sweety, we already hate everything MS. Take a wild guess…

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] manmachine@lemmy.world 174 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Was there ever a MS Teams feature anyone actually liked? Seems like the whole product is based on loathing.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 79 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Teams isn't made for the users.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] br3d@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Good to remember that the client for Teams isn't you - it's your IT department

[–] scops@reddthat.com 60 points 3 days ago

No, it's upper management. I don't give a fuck what you're doing all day as long as it doesn't create security vulnerabilities in the environment

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Lol, are you kidding? IT gets to experience the suck of using it, and of administrating it. For as bad as the front end of Microsoft stuff is, the back end is usually worse.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It’s for CSuite that doesn’t wanna pay for slack but sees teams bundled in office and says “good enough”

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 53 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I was at Shiny Night at one of the local Seattle furry bars a little while back and wound up hanging out with a bunch of folks in really well articulated fursuits talking shop. Eventually, as it does with any group of devs, the topic drifted to the classic game of "who hates Teams the most" and unfortunately it turned out the people I was drinking with:

1- Were mostly M$ developers working on Teams doing their 'team bonding' polycule thing.
2- Hate teams more than I could possibly ever manage. I mean, you think you hate teams? You think it's unmanagable, insecure, convoluted and a pain in the ass for your IT crew? Imagine what the backend for that disaster must look like, then make that your entire day job. My god, it was a level of vitriol matched only by discussing Deutsche Bhan with a group of drunk Germans...

[–] motogo@feddit.dk 6 points 2 days ago

Around here employers gets to pay trillions if they even put themselves in the position of snooping on employee data , like location, without a distinct need for each individual they snoop on.

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We have teams. It sucks. They’re going to make us use it for phone calls soon.

[–] GalacticRobot@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The phone calls part is one of the better parts at least for me) for Teams. It has it's own number, works on all the devices, can forward, and works well. I don't want to carry a work phone, and don't want a desk phone in the office (even though we have ones that connect to Teams). If there is a better solution that's 'cheaper' all for it, but seems pretty sold.

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

My issue with it is people using their computers for calls; we have cheap ass dell laptops and there are always echoes and lags in the audio. When they finally set us up, I’m going to make sure all my calls are routed to my cell phone.

[–] GalacticRobot@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh that makes sense, I typically use a headset and avoid the built in trash that most laptops have and it seems to work pretty well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Seems like malicious compliance would be using the shitty service and giving them the shitty quality connection they asked for.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works 47 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] RedditRefugee69420@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Many also do not care, unfortunately.

Let's not get that Lemmy echo chamber vibe where a few dozen of us agree that millions of Windows users don't exist.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 34 points 3 days ago (3 children)

it reduces the need to manually update your status, and it also enables co-workers to know that you're at work so that they can coordinate in-person meetings with you.

They're not even trying with these weak ass justifications anymore. Are either of these things an actual problem for anyone?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Basically, Microsoft Places and Teams have received workplace check-ins via Wi-Fi. The idea is that if an employee arrives at the office and connects to their enterprise network, their profile status indicator will show them as being present in the office.

Joke's on you. My work is so stingy, they don't offer WiFi to employees. Also, I've blocked location permissions in Teams, just in case.

[–] underscores@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

God damn I hate this universe, why is technology a tool to create new shackles instead of breaking old ones

[–] crimson_iris@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago

Because it makes the people at the top more powerful.

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago (2 children)

If it's a new Teams feature I'm going to hate it regardless of what it does. MS doesn't make software for human beings any more.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I too have a hard time seeing management as human,

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PlantJam@lemmy.world 54 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Microsoft says that this feature is basically a replacement for physical workplace check-in peripherals, it reduces the need to manually update your status

Considering how much I have to manually fix my regular teams status, I have doubts as to how effective this will be.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] otter@lemmy.ca 58 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Hmm...

Image generated with Microsoft Copilot

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 50 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago

Should give the teams logo a whip at this point

[–] folekaule@lemmy.world 43 points 3 days ago (2 children)

My company device already has so much surveillance on it that this won't make a meaningful difference to me.

However, given that they can't even get my activity status right, I don't see it going well. For example It sets me we idle even if I'm typing furiously in my editor, unless I go wave my mouse cursor in Teams for a few seconds. Other chat apps got this right decades ago.

It doesn't deliver messages or delivers them out of order. Unread status on messages doesn't work right. It crashes randomly. I could go on.

Fix the core functionality, Microsoft, instead of adding all kinds of big brother bullshit. I don't trust Teams to get anything right and neither should my manager.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago

Users as in (office) workers. I cast a enormous doubt that there is no living person who chose Teams over literally any other messaging app just to use it for their main way of communication outside of their workspace.

[–] Rubanski@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I am curious, because the Teams hate is pretty substantial here, what are the reasons you hate Teams. I feel besides it's Microsoft (!) and it is a resource hugger plus why tf do I need a second app telling me I have a meeting besides the main one (outlook) it's okayish? Maybe because I was never allowed to try alternatives? Please, tell me

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 5 points 2 days ago

Because Microsoft, and just the constant little BS problems I'm always having with it. Which are probably a result of being subjected to Microsofts shit QA processes. They're always changing shit with it while the problems that have been there for years keep occurring. Also my work decided we don't need actual desk phones because Teams calls work just as well (they don't).

[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

I miss Skype. I think Zoom is better. It just worked in the browser, on a Linux host. The dependencies for Teams is icky to me.

[–] moonburster@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I don't think I hate teams for the same reason as most on this site. My gripe is the stability issues. Just at my department alone there are 20 different issues per teams. Some range from buttons working after a few presses to teams just bsod the device. On my laptop teams has a memory leak and which is persistent. I have to clear teams every week or it will not even start up anymore

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 29 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I look forward to everyone being shown as located in the major city where our VPN is listed instead of where we actually are. That's how it works for browsers and other location based functionality now.

[–] harmony@piefed.blahaj.zone 20 points 3 days ago

Even without VPN, IP-based location has always shown me in all sorts of random places, sometimes even in the opposite end of my country. Guess it's an ISP thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Since teams is for connecting people remotely (office to office, office to other departments, etc) what sense does this make?

Being "in office" has nothing to do with my location.

Microsoft sucks so much.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago

Easier to control if your employee is actually at the office instead of working from home.
It's not like the pandemic proved most office jobs could actually be done remotely...

[–] magnue@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

Location: at work.

load more comments
view more: next ›