this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
359 points (98.6% liked)

Privacy

11126 readers
307 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 97 points 4 months ago (3 children)

One person shits their pants, everyone has to wear diapers

Group punishments are bullshit

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 15 points 4 months ago

Group punishments are bullshit

And specifically against the Geneva conventions, lol! (When applied against groups of POWs.)

[–] s38b35M5@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Happy cake 🍰day, friend!

[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

thanks, happy belated cake day to you!

[–] rozodru@piefed.world 15 points 4 months ago

yeah coming from India this doesn't surprise me.

[–] amzd@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago

Don’t use centralized tools that can easily be blocked. This would’ve been basically impossible if they used delta chat

[–] XLE@piefed.social 12 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

The worst person you know made a good point.

Edit: barely privacy related because everything you do in a Telegram group is visible to Telegram administrators and will be controlled through their international partnerships. They already self-censored in Indonesia.

[–] loutr@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago

All telegram messages are sent unencrypted by default. It's possible to encrypt 1-on-1 chats by going through a convoluted process, but group messages can't be encrypted.

If you care about privacy at all, don't use telegram.

[–] Helkriz@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago

They think telegram is the only way to do it. 🙄

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

They can block everyone? How? I mean a vpn would work, yeah?

[–] zephiriz@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

Banned for cheating but banned for being used by scam centers. Naaa.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 1 points 4 months ago

This happens around Africa once in a while. Kenya, Ghana, and a couple other counties will have a panic and just ban SMS messages, or internet, or Facebook nationally for a day because of one paranoid minister of education. Kenya did the same thing with Telegram not long ago.

Though... Who uses Telegram that isn't an idiot kid or Russian scammer?

[–] phase@lemmy.8th.world -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Poor oligarch who has to feel sad that their nerwork is cut of 150M people. So gentle of them to defend this voices of thos who have to use something else now.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Petrov was de facto banned from Russia for refusing to fold into the government's requests to influence vkontakte? Dude's definitely too rich and has bad takes sometimes, but calling him an oligarch makes no sense

[–] phase@lemmy.8th.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ok. Not rich and impactfull enough to be an oligarch. But a person wining online when their business is impacted and saying it is an attack on millions of people which isn't.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

But telegram does have millions of users in India. Sure the attack part is slightly hyperbolic, but they were all impacted

[–] phase@lemmy.8th.world 1 points 4 months ago

Then he should instead make them heard. Propose a way to structure, complain, ... support them.

[–] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 months ago

Not using the power doesn't remove it from his grasp. The really rich owner class are oligarchs, even if some of them act benevolently or at least not like the trash they could be.