this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2026
326 points (98.8% liked)

World News

56611 readers
1899 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

In proper American fashion.

[–] III@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Now hold on there... just give me a generation or two to reassert American Exceptionalism into the children... and by then we will have once again saved a savage people by the grace of our own convictions. Saviors once again, having never done anything wrong.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 29 points 12 hours ago

Tough luck, LOSER! So, about those Epstein Files...

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 18 points 13 hours ago

They gained ground, we lost ground, and we're paying an obscene amount for it. That's the very definition of a loss.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

God look at him. So old.. Just so. Fucking old.

God! "If you're listening!"

[–] Marn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Good, the sooner this nonsense is ended the better. Good that Iran is getting money to rebuild. If only all the oligarchic and corpo backers were charged for the rebuild not broke US tax payers.

I swear half of the neo liberal talking points right now are trying to talking like trump pulling out is a bad thing. The whole war is bad and it would still be bad if we won in my opinion it would be worse if we won. I'd rather the US be a bit poorer than win and destroy another country.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 13 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Make Trump pay for it. When he's out, and he and his Nepo-Baby Demonspawn are all in prison for life, they're entire fortunes should be confiscated and used to restore all of his destruction. Leave whatever whelps are left behind as paupers, with only the Trump name to remind the rest of the world that they are the remnants of the greatest Treasonous Pedophile Crime Family of all time.

What a fucking Loser.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

He basically had negative money before he became president and now all the trump change he has grifted and stole is just a shadow of the amount in damages he has done to make that happen. There won't be enough to cover a fraction of what they have done.

Need to tax the Billionaires into millionaires.

[–] CyroSignal@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Wonderful news for today !

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 111 points 22 hours ago (8 children)

Naturally.

there were no clear objectives to begin with. Not even unclear political objectives. It was a war of choice for the sole purpose of distracting the world, and especially US citizens, of all the fucked up shit he was doing. Like Immigration and covering up the Epstein files.

And guess what. It worked.

now people are talking about gas prices and grocery prices and the war and not about epstein or his concentration camps.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago

We can talk about more than one thing.

[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

you do realize high gas and grocery prices make them way more unpopular than the epstein files could?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

He doesn’t care about being unpopular, he is a dictator beholden to nobody. He does care about protecting his kompromat that he has over all the other rich pedos. If it gets released it’s no longer valuable to him.

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@piefed.world 11 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Not sure how it distracts? People are capable of thinking about more than one thing.

I now associate Trump with Jan 6, Epstein, ICE and his failed war in Iran amongst many other things.

The reality is lots of Americans are Trump apologists and agree with what he's doing. That's why there isn't more outrage or action.

[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

People sure, but the media doesn't. Also how are you going to protest this? The less relevancy, the harder it is to organise.

[–] plutopos@lemmy.zip 7 points 16 hours ago

I think it wasn't just distraction from the Epstein files. It was also a way to manipulate the stock market. I.e. buy stocks, start a war that will raise those stocks as a side effect, then sell them. I just have no way to prove it

[–] Carmakazi@piefed.social 25 points 21 hours ago

The people who would be upset about ICE or corruption or Epstein are already upset about it. Everyone else is a collaborator or a bystander that's varying levels of contemptible. Nobody is really going to be swayed by "distractions."

What I dislike most about this narrative is the idea that if we stayed locked in on Epstein or what have you, it would all be over.

Talking about problems doesn't inherently fix them.

If 7 hours of 4k footage of Donald Trump raping children were aired on every major news network, what would the American people do differently from what they're doing now? The correct answer for the vast, vast majority I think is "fuckall." Anyone who's paying attention can reasonably determine that Trump is a vicious sexual predator and client of trafficked women and children, but the only question that matters is "what is anyone going to do about it?"

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 26 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah I haven't bought this argument since day one of the whole thing. Trump didn't go to war to distract from Epstein or ICE, at least not as directly as you make it.

Pre-war polling saw that Trump's popularity was pretty much unchanged with likely R voters even through last summer, the December vote, and Bondi's firing. He's made it very clear he doesn't feel like he needs to win over new supporters, either, and with both houses still R at least through November, there wasn't much reason for him to care about Epstein. It was already out of the news and voters were buying the Bondi-scapegoat story.

The idea that Trump was actually super upset that people were mad about ICE and wanted a distraction is just funny. The show of force, shock, confusion, and coverage was the point, Stephen Miller said as much from day 1, and to reiterate: Trump wasn't losing any R votes over these policies.

Right wing media had both of these under control with a good spin on them. There was literally no reason to do something so obviously doomed and tank the one thing every American (apparently) cares about, gas prices, to distract from either of these stories that were already on their way out.

Trump started a war with Iran because 1) it's the thing Israel has been begging anyone to back them up on for fifty years and 2) he felt bullet proof (militarily and petrologically) after Venezuela.

/rant. I had a much better version of this typed up and then refreshed the page and lost it all :-)

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 10 points 21 hours ago

And don't forget, crippling middle east oil exports made a lot of US oil companies a LOT of money.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

i think some of it was to gauge how far the R is willing to still support him, and to distract. the MSM were reporting anything and everything from trump, including his gaffes thats why.

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world 18 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

He was acting under orders from Netanyahu

Israel stole even more of Palestine, as well as significant amounts of Lebanon

They'll keep stealing more while the rest of the world looks uncomfortably at their shoes for fear of being labelled antisemites

[–] mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 hours ago

Come on . No western politicians support for israel is about the fesr of being called an antisemite

[–] Maiq@piefed.social 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Not sure we have moved on from the Epstein files and Trumps involvement in them. I remember seeing lots of talk about the Epstein files all throughout the epic failure of a war.

I won't move on till the victims get their justice. Not even trumps death is gonna change that. It's not just about one very implicated orange fascist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 9 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

lost? we wernt even making headways from the start. lost hte moment BIBI pressured trump to attack iran. plus its one of the big things that is distraction for the news, now the war is having less effect on the news, people are focusing on the epstein files again, so hes coming up with other schemes.

[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

It was never America's war.

More obviously than about any war in modern memory, this was a war of the oligarchs - of Trump and Netanyahu and the Republicans and the Zionists - of Palantir and AIPAC and Raytheon and OpenAI.

The American people fought it and will end up paying for it, but it was never their war.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 hours ago

Almost all wars are the war of the oligarchs

[–] Tabula_stercore@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago

Cope. It is the USA's war

[–] Hegar@fedia.io 9 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

More obviously than about any war in modern memory

Ooph that's a tough call. More obvious than Iraq 2? "WMDs!!" was even more of a joke in iraq than it currently is in iran, which is saying something.

They literally flew in military transports full of cash which remain unaccounted for, spent by the VP's company and a mercenary oligarch whose cruelty and graft were so well known he then had to change the name of his company twice.

And that's not even getting into the insanely illegal corruption that was the coalition provisional authority.

[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Right, but they also went out of their way to drum up as much public support as they could first. Granted that it was all lies and greed and corruption, at least they went through the motions of trying to make it a war the people supported.

Trump didn't even bother to do that much.

Even though it's just two variations on awful, there is a difference between pretending that the people matter and not even bothering to do that.

[–] rezad@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

"The best summary of Trump’s trade “philosophy” comes from Trashfuture’s November Kelly, who said that Trump is flipping over the table in a poker game that’s rigged in his favor because he resents having to pretend to play the game at all."

[–] gukleszl4hs48ughgxhr5xgd@fedia.io 11 points 22 hours ago

Obviously, but maybe shut the fuck up about it on the however slim chance that the US is able to walk away from it. Similar vibes to seeing the TACO memes/statements thrown about when trump, for whatever reasons, decides not to do the abhorrent thing of the day. Is the goal to make sure he always picks the bad option?

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 4 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

It’s not over, and the Straight of Malacca is next

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

The strait of Malacca isn't an exclusive choke point like the strait of Hormuz or the Dardanelles. Ships can take other routes avoiding belligerent countries in the area. Even the Suez/bab al-mandab isn't an exclusive choke point, because you can still just go all the way around Africa, it's just a pain in the ass.

The Straits of Denmark, Hormuz, and Dardanelles are uniquely strategic choke points because the are the only seaward access points to their respective seas, Baltic, Persian and Black, which are controllable by one country and which other countries rely on.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of ships pass through the strait of Malacca, but if it closed the alternative isn't very further away.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 2 points 19 hours ago

We don't have nuclear weapon and we're slowing running out of oil, so very unlikely.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world -4 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

~~America~~ DONALD and BIBI have lost THEIR war with Iran.

America did not vote for this, did not want it, and did not support it. In fact, America purposely voted against forever wars in 2024.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

"There's an old saying in Tennessee - I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee - that says, fool me once, shame on... shame on you. Fool me - you can't get fooled again."

— George W. Bush

When you vote for somebody who lied to you their first term, you're voting for whatever they want their second term.

[–] Undvik@fedia.io 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Why would you believe voting for Trump was voting against wars? It makes no sense

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world -2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It makes no sense

Your opinion is incorrect. There were two good reasons to believe this:

  • His record: Donald spent part of his first term disentangling us from the forever wars, particularly in Syria and Afghanistan, where his admin negotiated our withdrawal.
  • He literally said 'No More Forever Wars' during his campaign. Those exact words. Repeatedly.

Record corresponding to rhetoric is a very good reason to believe someone will adhere to what they say.

[–] Undvik@fedia.io 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

And you believed him? You believed Trump's word? LOL

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world -1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Don't reply if you're not willing to actually read a person's response. It just makes you look silly.

[–] Undvik@fedia.io 3 points 6 hours ago

I did read your response. And if the rest of Americans think like you the situation is more dire than I thought.

Believing the word of a clearly demented fascist that will be in charge of the world's biggest military, the joke writes itself. And that's after you already had 4 years of trump.

[–] Ardha@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Every single vote is a way to legitimize the American government and system, the American government was founded on the idea of invading other people. If Americans want to vote against wars maybe they should actually organize and go shoot their politicians instead of voting for the parties that have been nothing but warmongers and coup doers in the past century.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Whatever you like it or not the president of the usa represent the state. The usa and israel lost the war

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Be that as it may, he's acting in direct contradiction to the objective wishes of the state and the electorate, so pretending this is something the American people support is stupid.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago

Nobody claimed this war had popular support. The legal framework of international relations consider the actions of the Head of State as the actions of the country itself.

load more comments
view more: next ›