this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2026
346 points (99.7% liked)

Not The Onion

21788 readers
886 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/66695030

Climate experts say it demonstrates the need to ‘take climate change seriously and learn from what is happening around the world’

Archived version: https://archive.is/newest/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/extreme-heat-event-london-cancelled-b3001379.html


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 34 minutes ago

Fortunately I have a gas powered air conditioner /s

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 1 points 16 minutes ago

"It's too late now, nothing we can do"

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 37 minutes ago

Brilliant marketing

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago

If the event couldn't be cancelled that way, no one would need it!

[–] tal@lemmy.today 16 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

The event, which was set to take place on Wednesday at the Shaw Library

The event venue, like most buildings in London, does not have any cooling mechanisms in place,

I think that every library I've ever been in in the US has been climate controlled. I suspect that it's not just for the comfort of patrons, but that it probably preserves books.

searches

https://conserv.io/blog/book-storage-humidity/

According to the Northeast Document Conservation Center (NEDCC), optimal relative humidity (RH) levels for paper materials lie somewhere between 30% and 50% with a certain preference for the lower end to slow down deterioration reactions. (NEDCC, 2018)

The Library of Congress, for example, suggests about 35% RH for works on paper. However, this low RH may not be suitable for all books in your collection. For example, leather-bound books may require higher humidity levels to maintain their flexibility and avoid cracking or tearing (CCI, 2018).

High humidity levels can create an ideal environment for mold growth and pest infestations. Mold thrives in humid conditions (65% and above), and if left unchecked, can cause permanent damage to your collection, including staining, weakening, and even disintegration of materials (Conserv o Gram, National Park Service, 2007). Additionally, many pests, such as silverfish and booklice, are attracted to warm, damp environments and may cause further mechanical harm to your books as they graze over the surfaces (AIC Wiki).

https://weather-and-climate.com/average-monthly-Humidity-perc,London,United-Kingdom

London's humidity levels vary throughout the year. The highest levels occur in November, reaching 81% (very high), while the lowest is recorded in April at 64%.

Throughout the year, the average humidity in London is 72%.

[–] Hazel@piefed.blahaj.zone 6 points 8 hours ago

Most likely they have a climate controlled archive for long term storage, just not in the auditorium.

[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 46 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

If it makes anyone feel better, the Heat Death of the Universe will solve this issue permanently.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I can't wait to experience that billions of year in the future.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 16 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

You are off by many orders of magnitude.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 9 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

That number is way too big for this monkey brain to understand.

[–] Womble@piefed.world 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

For a little context, saying our sun is seconds from dying is about as accurate as saying the universe will undergo heat death in billions of years (taking heat death to be no more active stars left in the universe).

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Comparing orders of magnitude or comparing proportion?

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

A trillion can still be counted in billions. Same as all the other orders of magnitude above that. 👍

[–] ButteredBread@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 hours ago

just use decimals for the ones below

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

We're talking about big enough numbers to whip out the scientific notation. Even counted in billions.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Still, just the same.

[–] Carighan@piefed.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Aren't we currently looking at a cold death? As in, don't worry, this heat issue will solve itself?

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 20 points 12 hours ago

How could anyone have predicted that though

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 11 hours ago