this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2026
88 points (73.7% liked)

Asklemmy

54824 readers
473 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I’ve been on Lemmy for about 2 weeks now, and I’ve noticed a trend:

The VAST majority of posts that mention AI in any manner are some dig or criticism or some other negative commentary, and the rare ones that have anything positive to say about it almost always have negative whatever-Lemmy’s-version-of-karma-is.

I get that AI isn’t without its problems, especially Grok with that “Mechahitler” nonsense a bit ago, but there seems to be particular vitriol here. I’m genuinely curious to know why people hate it so much here.

(page 4) 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't hate AI. I use AI. I criticize AI, because it's a tool and it's being misused.

I criticize how people and specially companies use AI....

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 week ago
[–] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

I agree with this take. It’s a tool, used terribly for the most part, but I wouldn’t have expected the world to make great films with cameras 3 years in either.

[–] robotElder2@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago

If you can't tell that the outputs are bad then you just have bad taste. People hate it because it sucks and it drowns out what's real.

[–] RoddyStiggs@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago

It's an exploitation tool with no benefit to actual people.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago

Because it sucks ass, fucking duh

[–] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago
[–] Hazy@aussie.zone 10 points 1 week ago

AI is great. AI under capitalism is awful.

[–] AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

It is the dot com bubble all over again, we all know the internet completely transformed the world but during that hyperphase anything with .com was getting money tossed at it.

We are in the same phase with AI. It will likely completely transform tech and medicine and a number of other fields. However 90% of what is being pushed right now is not good uses for it. They are masking the real costs for it. We are likely going to end up with an oversupply of datacenters just like all the unused dark fibre we had in the .com age. It will eventually transform into more useful things but "most" not "all" of it is hype right now.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There are some basic responsibilities they need to meet like not violating copyright and licensing on source material creating a double standard where corp slop can pirate without charges but individuals can't and building and running data centers that aren't in conflict with the community they are running in. They also should have warnings about anthropomorphizing language models that don't think or reason but I'd settle for the first two to start.

As usual it's not the technology that's the problem, it's the dumbass way it's implemented in a profit motive

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

I don’t hate ‘AI’, I don’t acknowledge it exists.

None of the use cases of LLMs I’ve observed can in any way be legitimately argued to be a form of intelligence, and anyone arguing otherwise is betraying their absence of said trait.

LLMs are explosively imprecise, statistically luke-warm, grey goo extrusion spinsters, which is why all the logos for ‘AI’ companies are variations of arseholes.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Because the endgame of the way we are developing the technology is not Star Trek but I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream.

It's an existential threat, a Great Filter.

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago

Been around long enough to know that we are being sold on a lie that's real purpose is extracting wealth at the fastest rate possible from the lower 99% while providing unknown risks and low likelihood of benefits to most of the population. The only "AI" that currently works well is a very fast database searcher. It is better than a human at that task but requires humans to create the database and all the information in it first in order for it to work. The only "AI" that seems to be possibly "thinking" for itself is hopeless, wrong, and/or very destructive.

[–] potato_lemon@feddit.nl 7 points 1 week ago

It's because AI in the form of LLMs is a piece of SHIT BS lies generator FUCKING GODDAMN copyright theft! SHITTY ASS LIAR CLANKER dumb bot

[–] ElcaineVolta@kbin.melroy.org 6 points 1 week ago

for every reason.

[–] orenj@leminal.space 6 points 1 week ago

'cause i'm a hater and being a hater RULES have you tried it? much better than prompting a hundred times for something that looks or reads likes shit

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

The reasons why so many people hate it. Are lengthy.

A big one is we see jobs already being eliminated. And people like to live in this fantasyland that oh there’ll be new jobs created. But anybody who has studied history, realizes that that’s not going to happen in this case.

For example, when we switched from horse and buggy to motorized vehicles,. The people built the buggies they could be cross trained to build the vehicles. Jobs were created.

When we switched from the mechanical typewriter to the electronic typewriter that was easy cross train. When we moved away from the electronic typewriter to a computer, there were jobs created.

Here’s the problem that we run into. Let’s just look at accounting. Many jobs in the accounting field can be done by a properly trained AI system. Most data entry jobs can be done by AI. Many programming jobs are being handed off to AI. You were seeing this across all industries. Whereare the jobs going to be actually created at?

There are some data entry jobs to program AI. But those are minimum wage jobs at best.

As AI becomes better and better, they will be able to take more and more jobs.

We are already seeing AI being used to create music. There goes a lot of musicians jobs. There a goes a lot of songwriting jobs.

This is becoming a very large problem. Because you will still have the same number of people looking for work, but you’ll have less jobs. That means the pay for said jobs will drop drastically. Supply and demand.

The people who truly believe there will be magically new jobs created as far as I’m concerned or absolutely delusional.

Another big problem is it limits human interaction. I know there’s a lot of people that don’t want to talk to anybody, but here’s the reality. Humans are social creatures. As we become More and more isolated, It becomes harder for us to sympathize and empathize with other people. That makes it easier to create divisions between people. Trust me, the governments will absolutely use that to their benefit.

[–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

I like humans and human creativity and human intelligence and I think everyone using a technology that actively makes you bad at those things while spitting out crappy jumbled regurgitations of someone else's work is not a good thing.

[–] kinkles@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

People here are privy to the many downsides of rapid AI adoption vs Facebook grandmas who use it to make memes and identify weird bugs in their house.

[–] Klanky@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

This whole thread is a great honeypot for my ‘AI Techbro’ user tag!

[–] PetteriPano@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I can agree with most of the points in the thread. Especially the forced use of AI where it makes no sense.

I'm a software engineer going on my second decade in developing media streaming technologies.

LLMs are useful in my day-to-day work. They speed up development a lot, but I do realise that I am getting disassociated with my codebase. I know that the individual commits are on a level that I would've written myself, often even better. But I don't know the codebase as intimately as if I actually wrote it myself. The cognitive load of reviewing two other people's AI-assisted code is also very taxing.

But, we can hate it as much as we want. Pandora is out of her box, and it's better to get ahead with it than be left behind.

[–] kepix@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

mostly ram prices, and shittify every service and program and search engine.

[–] Rindogang@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Keep in mind that the people against AI are usually very vocal about it, while the ones who use it stay quiet

Because of that, it's easy to get the wrong impression about how most people actually feel

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Around me the ones who use ai are as vocal as vegans and CrossFit people

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago (8 children)

the ones who use it stay quiet

If you're gonna make shit up at least try to make it remotely believable

[–] Beehaw_Girl@beehaw.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Okay how about the ones who use it have frequently been reported in the news as having ai psychosis. 😄 That's truth.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Psychosis, a famously quiet condition!

/s

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's very believable, who wants to admit to having a different opinion when everyone is so angry about something?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mesamunefire@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Most commercial models were trained without permission via stolen artwork, copyrighted materials, etc...

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Copyright - which the vast majority of people on Lemmy must care deeply about, outside of this topic.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] elevenbones@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

I wonder why? 🤔🤔🤔

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›