this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
363 points (98.9% liked)

Steam Hardware

23200 readers
480 users here now

A place to discuss and support all Steam Hardware, including Steam Deck, Steam Machine, Steam Frame, and SteamOS in general.

As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Deck] - Steam Deck related.
[Controller] - Steam Controller related.
[Machine] - Steam Machine related.
[Frame] - Steam Frame related.
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

If your post is only relevant to one hardware device (Deck/Machine/Frame/etc) please specify which one as part of the title or by using a device flair.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

Link to our Matrix Space

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I just got an email from dBrand cancelling the Steam Machine companion cube shell.

They posted the rationale on reddit, /r/dBrand but for the good folks who don't do reddit anymore, here's their post:

"RIP Companion Cube

🚨 Announcement 🚨

As you’ve probably noticed, the Steam Machine Companion Cube was eviscerated from our website, YouTube, and other social media platforms last week.

The blunt version is that we made the Companion Cube without a license from Valve. Everyone who purchased a Companion Cube will have their refund issued by end-of-day. Everything else beyond this is just detail. If you want the full story, keep reading.

On November 12th 2025, the day the Steam Machine was announced, we put up a concept render and sign-up page to see if anyone would be interested in a Companion Cube enclosure. It went moderately viral, with over fifteen thousand people signing up to be notified in the first day. In the months that followed, we built the idea into something real without ever asking Valve if we could.

We’re going to regret that decision for a very long time.

Over the next seven months, we poured our souls into this project. More than a thousand hours went into engineering from our industrial design team. Forty-four sets of injection molding tools were developed, one for each of the cube's sub-components. The entire product was redesigned from scratch more than once, just to get the way it cradles the console exactly right. We literally rented out a university campus to film the launch video. By the end, we were losing money on every $99 Poverty Cube sold, but it didn’t matter. This had turned into a passion project for the entire organization.

Unfortunately, being proud of the thing we made did not give us the right to make it.

We launched around 3am on Monday, June 22nd. Overnight, it became the second-fastest selling product in our 15-year history, behind only the Switch 2 Killswitch.

Shortly after, Valve’s legal team reached out. They stated that the Companion Cube is Valve intellectual property, for which dbrand does not have a license. They requested we take down the product and launch film immediately. This was entirely within their rights, and they were direct, fair, and respectful throughout.

We took everything down and made an appeal. We asked Valve whether there was any way to keep the project alive: properly licensed, with their blessing, on their terms. They said no. Given our backwards approach of building first and asking permission later, it was a fair answer.

That’s basically the whole story. We made something a lot of people were excited about, then incinerated our shot at bringing it to market. It’s a hard lesson to learn publicly.

It goes without saying, but we’ll say it regardless: Valve didn’t do anything wrong here. They built a game franchise a lot of people love and they alone get to decide how it’s used.

To everyone who was as excited about this project as we were: thank you, and sorry. Refunds are being issued today. If it hasn’t landed in your account by the end of this week, you know how to reach us.

To Valve: thank you for Portal, and sorry for the headache. We should’ve asked first."

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 7 points 2 months ago (5 children)

What is it, just a case for it? Does it provide any functionality, or is it purely aesthetic?

Honestly if they just called it something else there wouldn't be an issue, right? Just call it some other type of cube and in the description list the compatible hardware, which is just the steam machine.

Not sure why Valve would care so much, as it's not like this would take away from their sales. I'm guessing it's mainly a representation thing. They don't want to allow a precedent where anyone can use their product's name in an unofficial capacity, where their company's reputation might be affected by consumers not realizing there's no affiliation

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

... then incinerated our shot at bringing it to market.

Did they also incinerate all the Companion Cubes they already made?

[–] Lemmchen@feddit.org 7 points 2 months ago
[–] Juviz@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That is one of the best and probably Most sincere apologies I’ve ever heard from a company. Sucks for the product, but those guys seem to be all right

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Just make Frank face plates. Surely nothing will go wrong.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Except Sony wants PC gamers to eat shit and expects them to buy their $1,000 console for PC quality games now. They would definitely not agree to that

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They would definitely not agree to that

dbrand wouldn't ask them – as usual

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago

😅 oh shit of course they wouldn't

[–] baller_w@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Release it as 3d printing templates open source 🙌

[–] ohshit604@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

I’m sure Valves legal team would enjoy that.

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago

dBrand is a garbage company.

[–] Shatur@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Strange that they did this after the price reveal. Could they have decided that it's not very profitable and maybe the case required further adjustments (like it doesn't fit or melts since they developed it before they could get a prototype), and this is why they canceled it entirely? LTT had a companion cube, but they never put it on the Steam Machine.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›