this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2026
303 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

86047 readers
3815 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] motruck@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

It'll be ok. Just stop buying shit. They haven't needed new computers for years now they just act like they do. See windows 11 required hardware roll out. You think that is a new tactic? That is just them being overt about a practice that has existed forever.

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 15 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The ‘AI’ angle is purely cover for the manufacturers actively choosing to now behave like the pharmaceutical industry. They’ve identified a window to pull this shit, and coordinated this opportunistic collusion.

The only meaningful response is to create a diverse production base to remove the choke point the current incumbents are leveraging, but that would require a concerted, collaborative effort by parties who can’t see and/or don’t understand the problem.

[–] HereIAm@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

To play devil's advocate; it might be that the RAM producers see AI as a bubble, and it would be incredibly risky to expand their production now, when it won't come into effect until a handful of years from now.

RAM and SSD manufacturers have already seen many many dips and rises in price over decades.

However, that all of them are deciding not to expand and potentially rake in the cash is more than a little sus.

I'm not sure how to feel about it personally. I hope the true cost of maintaining these AI models gets passed down to customers soon so that it either crashes and burn, or at the very least stabilises the market.

[–] IamLost@lemmy.world 18 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

Thought I could wait to build a new PC, but at this point, it'll be another 5-10 years before things start getting better. After the price of the steam machine, I ordered parts to build my own. Such a bad time to build, but it's just gonna get worse the longer I wait.

[–] criscodisco@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

If they get better. By the time the AI sector collapses under the weight of its own bullshit, things will have already gotten significantly worse. You’ll be less worried about RAM prices and more worried about bread prices.

Don't worry you might get $25 in a class action for bread price fixing. I think there should be a class action against the manufactures of Ram and hard drives. Most companies scale up when they have more demand, these fucks ain't, theyre pulling a classic OPEC

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I could crash the prices by tomorrow if I wanted to. All I'd have to do is buy some ram today.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago

This is /r/wallstreetbets logic. I approve.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 4 points 11 hours ago

I am figuring on selling off my previous machine once the teething issues with the new one has been resolved. Given these specs, what would be a fair price, Lemmings? I was guessing around $2,250 without the drives, but I am not really on the pulse of the market.

00000

  • CPU = Ryzen 5950x + Noctua heatsink with Kryosheet.

  • PSU = SeaSonic Vertex GX-1200

  • MOBO = Crosshair Hero VIII + WiFi

  • CASE = Rosewill Thor V2

  • RAM = DDR4 3600, 128gb total, came as a kit of 4 sticks.

  • STORAGE (OPTIONAL) = x2 to x5 4tb SSD SATA drives, non-NVME.

00000

The biggest issue here is doing an RMA on the CPU. It is unstable when PBO is enabled. Since I suck at techno surgery, I wouldn't be able to install the replacement without forking over money to a technician. Maybe I can make that contingent on buying at least 2 SSD SATA drives?

My new machine has only 4 SATA ports, and the SATA card to support all five SSDs and the optical disc drive is taking up a GPU slot. Being able to buy some 2280 M2 drives would solve that problem for me. That would gel nicely with a technician handling the transfer of the SATA SSDs back to the old machine for the new owner, since the tech can also get the M2 and a third GPU into my new PC.

[–] sinematic@lemmy.zip 4 points 8 hours ago

Type shit that happens to me when I earn my own money

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 24 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Things are probably going to get worse in the short term, but the AI bubble is going to burst. Magnitude? We'll see, but when investors realize that these companies cannot make a profit, and open source frontier models that allow you to run AI in house are removing vendor lock in, things are going to change. Also, LLMs are a dead end, and have little room to improve.

Newer paradigms are appearing, such as Yann LeCun's JASP, which actually learns, and other approaches, which will make LLMs obsolete, and are way less hardware intensive.

Another factor is the Chinese closing in in consumer grade RAM. If it can be proven that no backdoor or other shenanigans are there, they will balance things somewhat.

While current reality is what it is, there may be a massive social and traditional media manipulation by the big three and other interested parties to fuel fear of rising prices forever, to push people to buy as much as they can at these prices. I have no proof of this, but I don't think it's far fetched.

And let's not forget that for media outlets, fear and tragedy sells. (I think Hearst or some other news mogul said that last century.)

[–] Prathas@lemmy.zip 7 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Yann LeCun's JASP

Wait, this is my first time reading about this. Got an ELI5 or TL;DR?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 38 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I've come to terms with the fact I'm not going to be buying any new computer-type devices until the bubble pops.

I'm just terrified what happens if one of my existing devices breaks. If a RAM stick goes bad, I might have to mortgage my non-existent house.

[–] Chaf@slrpnk.net 16 points 12 hours ago

In case you are being serious, there are ways around faulty RAM sticks, usually just a few cells/rows are affected. In case anyone needs to know this, here is a pretty good summary on stackoverflow on how to deal with this on linux. In general, look for "memmap".

Keep your hardware running as long as possible! Iirc newer RAM is unfortunately somewhat more susceptible to failing. My DDR3 is still working fine.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

How long does it take a company already established in the sector to build a RAM factory?

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Around 4 years. The creation of any microchip requires extremely stable geology, pristine rooms, high levels of training, Scrooge McDuck moneybins, and so on. It isn't an industry that can turn on a dime.

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

4 years after they break ground. God knows how long to decide the location, bribe the authorities to get tax breaks...

[–] tixooo@lemmy.zip 28 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Time to hit the books, explore the mountains, build a chicken shed, grow something in the garden, buy a plot of land and grow something... Build a house myself idk things like that.

[–] louloukoutsis@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Yep, definitely not buying any new computers any time soon. If anything breaks I’ll try to live with it as much as I can.

Fuck this pricing.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Arancello@aussie.zone 61 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

it will be ironic when consumers cant afford the end user devices needed to interact with the AI servers. House of cards??

[–] GalacticSushi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 118 points 19 hours ago (7 children)

Let me put on my tinfoil hat really quick.

They want to kill personal computing. You don't need a full blown computer, you need a fire stick style device that plugs into your monitor and allows you to remotely access the virtual machine you rent from Microsoft on a monthly basis.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

This is 100% the plan. Also, I would not be suprised if in 5-10 years there are legal limitations on what kind of computing capacity a private person can purchase due to “national security” reasons.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 17 points 15 hours ago

There is no tinfoil about it. Jensen Huang and the other tech oligarchs have openly stated that is their goal.

[–] chrash0@lemmy.world 56 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

this has been “the plan” since 2005. when i was in high school trying to figure out what the heck “cloud computing” was, this is what they were talking about: anything requiring more compute than secure authentication and pixel drawing would be rendered in the cloud and delivered to dumb terminals. this is what netbooks, Chromebooks, and smartphones have been a step towards if not an implementation of.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 21 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

Looking back at computing history, cloud computing is basically reverting back to the original mainframes and dedicated terminals.

There was a hype of using thin clients, the concept is that you get just enough hardware and software to be able to connect to a session running on a shared server, the admin can allocate more resources like CPU cores, RAM and storage as individual needs change over time.

As an IT guy, I do like the concept in a corporate environment, especially when looking at the SunRay system from Sun, which used smartcards for easier access, you put your card into the client and if configured properly, you got your old session loaded and ready in a few sec, regardless of which client you put your card into.

The YT channel Clabretro has several interesting SunRay videos.

[–] MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com 1 points 10 hours ago

It sucks that the world we live in is the way it is because in theory this would be an ideal model for so many people. Older adults I know really just need a Facebook terminal but are required to buy a whole computer. If anything at all goes wrong with it they freak out and buy a brand new one. So much tech waste and so much hardware not being used for the majority of the time. If they had lightweight terminals there'd be less issues on their end but even if they replaced it at the first issue, it wouldn't be an entire computer getting trashed. Since all they use is the occasional facebook the mandatory internet thing wouldn't even be an issue. Plenty of younger people might also be good candidates for this since they basically exclusively use online features too.

Obviously I would never trust this kind of service for a variety of reasons, but in theory the world could really benefit from that model.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 8 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Yup, there's a cycle between centralization and edge. Started with centralization, mainframes, went edge with the first PCs (and game consoles) and ever since corpos have been trying to pull it back to the center in waves. Thin client, cloud compute, arguably phones (as apps processing in the cloud), Geforce Now, AI. So far it's always gone back to the edge for most of the population, except for niche cases (or not in the case of phones). As internet gets faster and more reliable the chance of it sticking longer in the central zone increases (IMO).

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 8 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

As internet gets faster and more reliable the chance of it sticking longer in the central zone increases

It also allow the opposite, the fediverse is a living example of it, the more internet is faster the more we can organize better to decentralize, it's harder that someone get in contact with the decentralized internet but it's more probable that it happen now than 7 years ago

Some companies also would still continue to sell consumer hardware (like Framework, probably)

I see it as a fight, companies are currently winning sadly but we have the power to win too

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vext01@feddit.uk 4 points 14 hours ago

Sun ray was cool.

We had them at university with smart cards.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 25 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Dumb terminals don't need much RAM. Unfortunately, the minimal RAM would come with maximum rentiership and exploitation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thejml@sh.itjust.works 100 points 22 hours ago

The RAM I bought in 2019 for $100 is now over $500. at this rate I'll sell it in a few years to put my daughter through college.

[–] HackThePlanet@lemmy.ml 10 points 16 hours ago
[–] kinkles@sh.itjust.works 32 points 20 hours ago (6 children)

I see this as an opportunity to get invested in non-tech hobbies because there’s nothing else I can do

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 8 points 16 hours ago

Yup, was going DDR5 this year, got a new bike (Marin Larkspur) instead, such a good decision, renewed my love of cycling, having a ball.

[–] tixooo@lemmy.zip 10 points 18 hours ago

Books my man, books.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] moonlight@fedia.io 37 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

At this rate I'll be able to sell my ddr3 from over a decade ago and make a profit compared to what I paid originally

[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

Suggested my wife to get mini pc with 32gb of ddr5 ram. If she would sell half of it today, she'd be reclaiming 60% of what she paid for that minipc.

Originally I suggested her to get 64gb one so I could swap mine 32 with hers. She ultimately decided to not to. Could've been like 80% if she'd sell 32gb today. Crazy...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 19 points 20 hours ago

These price gouging assholes should probably be prosecuted along with the "AI" fraudsters.

load more comments
view more: next ›