this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
784 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

86131 readers
3244 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ddplf@szmer.info 17 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (6 children)

I just can't imagine having such excessive wealth and not saying "eh, whatever" when someone tells me I'm losing money on some internet fees.

You fucker, you could make the world at least a tiny bit better for billions of people at virtually no expense to you, but you just keep playing your stupid fucking rich manchildren games with your billionaire parasite buddies.

Keep grinding bro, maybe this way you'll get used to the feeling of having your bones crushed in the grinder.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

You don't get that wealthy in the first place by not gobbling up every fucking penny you have a chance to. You think he's just going to take the dub and stop?

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago

It makes more sense when you realize his wealth is all smoke and mirrors based on a shared lie.

[–] Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 hours ago

It's not evem really losing money it's inventing in the infrastructure youre using to make money.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That's why you'd never attain that wealth.

[–] ddplf@szmer.info 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I know, he's better than me by a factor of his net worth divided by my net worth. So around, what, 100 millions times?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Maggie@thelemmy.club 14 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Poor Elon, down to his last Trillion

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Marija@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago

I believe we'd rather see honest waitlists.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 21 points 19 hours ago (10 children)

I have a neighbor who has access to 1gb cable and 1gb fiber from two ISP's. Both have high data caps. Instead he is rocking the starlink and I can't for the life of me figure out how he thinks that shit is somehow better than a hard link.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] grandma@sh.itjust.works 37 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

America will do anything except lay some fucking cable to provide internet to the ruroids.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 14 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

It's crazy how behind US is on that. Americans say "yeah but US is bjg and mostly empty space" so is Asia and the rest of the world yet they are not defeated by a cable. It's just cable laying - come on, we solved cable laying 50 years ago.

[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Same reason rural places in the US also haven't discovered electricity yet. Oh, wait…

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

The US has a weird mix of big emplty spaces, really fucking expensive existing underground utilities and roadways, and private property (easements ain't free) that makes new underground utilities stupidly expensive to run.

You have to buy big easements, negotiate utility contracts with local and state governments (to use the public right-of-way), dodge existing infrastructure while repairing what you break, and lay a fuckton of cable.

I work on the municipal side, and despite Google Fiber having a utility agreement with us for years they still have yet to lay a single foot of underground fiber because we won't allow them to cut across roads that we just replaced in the last year, require their microtrenches to follow engineering standards, and they need to show existing underground water, gas, wastewater, and electrical services on their plans because they're famous for just running a trench and making it the water district's problem when they cut 7 public lines in an hour.

[–] GenericUsername@thelemmy.club 3 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

How many big empty rural areas in Asia have fiber optics internet relative to big empty rural areas in the US? I thought starlink was heavily used by a lot of counties where people didnt have great access to internet?

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Basic all rural areas have fiber/cell towers in Asia. Depends how you measure it but like 90% of populated Asia is connected and most of these stats are only being held back by Russia too.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 10 hours ago

How many big empty rural areas in Asia have fiber optics internet relative to big empty rural areas in the US?

I think China has done it for all of their rural villages (or maybe 98% it seems)

https://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201908/02/WS5d43f3c6a310cf3e355639b3.html

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1043951X22001110

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 13 points 21 hours ago (12 children)

We have terrestrial radio and cables. What is the point of this complex space-based trash?

[–] peripheralneuropathy@lemmy.world 24 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (3 children)

The US taxpayers literally paid TWICE to privatized telecom companies (telco) to run fiber optic to the home, once in the 90s and again that last early "surge" of FTtH(fiber to the home aka "last mile") when google started competing direct against telcos that would not get the lead out so they all buried a fuckton of (dark)fiber that they then kept artificially turned off and sat on their excess bandwidth instead of releasing that excess supply to the market to do bare standard minimum of using their good taxpayer funded fortune AND their privatized, ridiculously gained profits from the calculable increase of use in the information age YOY to offer it for reasonable prices. We could all be on $25 a month or less no cap 1GBps fiber in many places but again, the market forces at work at this point seem more actively just hostile to the rest of us on ground level here now. It's a fascinating and also infuriating subject as an ex-IT person that helped build out this infrastructure that only could watch as it all remained dark. I was stuck in rural nowhere where we still had a small local telephone cop-op. They took that money, laid fiber and sat on their asses with it while they charged exorbitant rates for 56k dial up service while Netzero and the such took dome of that broadband at a time when independent local ISPs were cropping up, teaming modems and some fiber to offer a service with a saner price structure and this was all before data caps and bandwidth throttling was evenr a thing because all you needed was single rack in strateic locations , set the equipment up and basically forget it with the only fixed costs was your mainline fiber, equipment, colocation etc and such yet they STILL offered 100% FREE dial-up internet, co caps off those systems(of course subsidized by ad networks).

htps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_fibre

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Service_Fund

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›