this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
233 points (97.9% liked)

World News

56999 readers
1542 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] plyth@feddit.org 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That is inevitable. The sky will be filled with the trash of struck down satellites and nothing can leave earth for a while. Before starlink, China had already demonstrated that they can shoot down satellites. No investigation needed.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 8 points 1 day ago

Even the worst Kessler syndrome scenarios don't stop new satellites from being launched through the debris-containing altitudes to reach clear orbits.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 22 hours ago

they already have anti-satellite missiles, they just need to build alot of them. or have jamming satellites of thier own,.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

We already have the technology if memory serves. Since civilians are the last to know, there have probably been satellite killers in orbit for years.

It's fun for Musk to get fucked, but I believe Ukraine uses Starlink to defend itself

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] FilthyHands@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago

Sorry, space is closed.

[–] Dpek@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago

According to the authors of the concept, if the resilience of a satellite constellation is ensured by its sheer number, then the response should be a weapon cheap enough to destroy satellites faster than SpaceX can launch new ones.

Smells of the good old forgeting that the target wont just sit by

At least they arent putting everything in one basket this time with physical destruction being the last option

Whats a satellite constallation destroyer but a anti ICBM weapon under a diffrent name?

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

That's great. No space for anyone.

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And so the star wars begins.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world -1 points 19 hours ago

eat it, musk

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

militarnyi.com

Cool.

Cool.

https://militarnyi.com/en/advertising/

Cool cool cool

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah! Fuck Starlink!

The one time I'm actually going to root for Russia and China.

[–] darthsundhaft@piefed.social -1 points 1 day ago

Nobody wanted them up there in the first place. Please fucking do.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›