this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
233 points (98.3% liked)

World News

56999 readers
1582 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dragginupagain@lemmy.today 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

'somebody at a security conference said one method of dealing with a target is destroying it'

wow incredible story. Surely this is being upvoted because it's a quality article about current events that are globally relevant and not because the musk obsessives are jerking off to the fantasy the headline presented.

There is an enough_musk_spam community where this stuff should be posted.

Here's the actual reporting that this clickbait was extracted from https://archive.ph/20260709102553/https://www.spiegel.de/international/world/the-new-axis-of-evil-der-spiegel-investigation-reveals-deep-military-cooperation-between-russia-and-china-a-12dc295a-413d-4a2f-b44f-2922092270e3#selection-1635.25-1635.374

[–] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder how much taxpayer money will be spent trying to protect musk's satellites.

[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Honestly, they are so cheap compared to anything that could kill them. The best passive defense strategy is to just launch more.

Obviously there are lots of active defense measures that would be on the table. But that would likely be the chosen passive defense strategy.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

I could get on board with that.

[–] Tiral@lemmy.world -2 points 2 hours ago

I'm surprised China just doesn't say they created a better Starlink. The CCP lies/makes up about everything else so what's one more thing.

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Ooh I'm actually all for this! Destroy ALL the satellites!

[–] Tiral@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The problem is they won't clean anything up.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Clean what up? The debris that burns up in the atmosphere?

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

This feels like one AI civ making a pact with a lesser AI civ that is already bogged down in war and clearly won't win the military victory it's going for, so that once it has run the course of its use will be invaded and incorporated with the bigger civ.

They're also already been sending settlers to the African continent, if it was me I'd be restarting the game because any turn now they will conquer Asia, Europe, and Africa, and achieve either a cultural or military victory by doomstack.

[–] mriormro@lemmy.zip -3 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Reality isn’t a video game.

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

OH SHIT! NO WAY!

[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I heard there's no respawn in RL.

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Depends on who you ask

[–] Phantaloons@piefed.zip 27 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Yay! but the Ukraine war effort Boo! but less space junk! Yay! but all those just... normal Starlink customers who need internet Boo! but fuck Musk! Yay!

I'm gonna need a drink.

[–] HerbGrower@slrpnk.net 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Blowing up satellites turns it from 1 bit of space junk into thousands...

[–] CorporalCookie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

They're so low they'll just burn up

[–] signalsayge@infosec.pub 4 points 5 hours ago

I think by pure count, the amount of space junk would go up. The pieces would just be a lot smaller.

[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

How about a frozen yogurt? I call it frogurt.

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Why not frozurt? It sounds less cursed!

[–] tektite@slrpnk.net 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

The frogurt is also capitalist.

[–] tektite@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

But you get your choice of topping.

[–] tektite@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

The toppings contain regulatory capture.

Edit: That’s bad.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 86 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Yay!

Kessler Syndrome! Kessler Syndrome! Kessler Syndrome!

/s

[–] SparroHawc@piefed.world 48 points 1 day ago (17 children)

Low Earth orbit means that the debris will get dragged down by the atmosphere before it becomes a cascading problem. Thankfully.

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago

So we can directly pollute the upper atmosphere with heavy metals? I’m sure that’s a good thing. /s

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 12 points 1 day ago

On the plus side, global cooling achieved through a shield of reflective debris!

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›