Dumhuvud

joined 2 years ago
[–] Dumhuvud@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

you and that other weirdo

Ad hominem. How refreshing. Yawns. You'll get right along with that .blahaj.zone guy/gal/NB-person in the replies.

actually if its not from the pedophile region, otherwise it's just sparkling child abuse

What is a "pedophile region", anyway? Epstein's Island? And what's with that "otherwise"? Are you saying that pedophilia in "pedophile regions" is NOT child abuse? You should work on articulating your thoughts better, it's challenging to understand what you're trying to say.

[–] Dumhuvud@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago

I quoted the psychiatric definition on purpose.

The general population has a tendency of diluting medical, mostly psychiatric, terms, either rendering them meaningless (see people describing themselves as having OCD because they are quirky) or even turning them into slurs (see various names for intellectual disabilities, like "imbecile", "idiot" and so on).

I have an issue with that specifically. I replied to someone else why stretching the age from "prepubescent" to "below the legal age of consent" (hell, some poster even suggested "below the legal age of majority even if the legal age of consent is lower") bugs me.

[–] Dumhuvud@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

How's that moral high ground, dude? Feeling good about yourself? Calling me creepy, knowing fuck all about me.

I replied to others what's my issue with people diluting the term, just in case you give a shit.

[–] Dumhuvud@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Man "conveniently" referred to the psychiatric definition. Because the "sexual attraction to a person below the legal age of consent" definition is
a) harmful to victims of actual child sexual abuse (in my opinion);
b) geographically-dependent. In Europe the age of consent is 16, for example. According to the other posters, there are states in the US where it is lower than 18.

[–] Dumhuvud@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'm not protecting anyone, that is not my intent at all. Hell, I couldn't care less about American celebs or whoever this guy is.

My issue is literally in the first sentence. Watering down the term doesn't help victims of actual child sexual abuse. I'd argue it's actually harmful.

[–] Dumhuvud@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So how does a claim regarding Russia's technological capabilities relate to my original comment?

Your original comment literally calls Russia one of the world's "most technologically prominent" country, stop trying to gaslight me.

leaders of two of the world’s most technologically prominent countries

Putin and Xi

[–] Dumhuvud@programming.dev 0 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Not even remotely related to the part I quoted and laughed at, but I'll humour you.

It's called deduction, you just need to use that gray matter of yours. Two, rather old, psychopaths muse about extending one's lifetime. Could it be that they themselves have a vested interest in this? No, that must be a conspiracy theory by filthy liberals.

[–] Dumhuvud@programming.dev 4 points 3 months ago (5 children)

two of the world’s most technologically prominent countries

Russia

LMFAO. lemmy.ml users just can't stop glazing autocracies, can they?

[–] Dumhuvud@programming.dev 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"Earlier, people rarely lived to 70, but these days at 70 you are still a child," Xi told Putin according to the translator in Russian.

Hard to argue with that. Both of these cunts seem to lack any emotional intelligence whatsoever.

[–] Dumhuvud@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

You’re describing Secure Boot.

Secure Boot is literally configurable. You can create your own key and sign whatever you want with it. See sbctl.

view more: next ›