EpeeGnome

joined 2 years ago
[–] EpeeGnome@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago

Not surprisingly, people who couldn't admit when they were wrong didn't come into this thread and admit that they have been wrong.

[–] EpeeGnome@lemm.ee 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Right, but Qatar committed to treating those tourists as guests, and as far as I know, did exactly that, even easing some of their morality laws for the visitors. Attending the Qatar World Cup was unethical, but not stupidly self-endangering. Attending the World Cup in the US under the current situation is stupidly self-endangering, especially if you aren't "white", but also sometimes even then.

[–] EpeeGnome@lemm.ee 6 points 7 months ago

That's never stopped them before.

[–] EpeeGnome@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

That was a big factor. Nobody could steal the ball from him, they couldn't reach that low, and his fakeouts were legendary. I didn't follow the sport at all, but was glad to have to Hornets as my nearby team. Watching him go up against giants was so fun.

[–] EpeeGnome@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

I agree, it's insane that customs ever accepted a fictional port on uninhabited islands as a point of origin in the first place. That's the loophole they should close. It does appear that that's a thing that did actually happen though, so it's not a complete fabrication. I'd say customs should have been authorized to confiscate any such good until a non-fictional provinence was proven.

[–] EpeeGnome@lemm.ee 20 points 8 months ago

Yeah, I assume the now-former employee acted with full expectation of losing her job over this. She succeeded at bringing attention to something many people (myself included) hadn't heard about before, so she at least accomplished that much.

[–] EpeeGnome@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well, I'm doing my part against them by refusing to click on any bait headlines, but I fear it's a lost cause anyway.

[–] EpeeGnome@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It may not rise to the level of proof, but it is a memorable and easily understood demonstration of something already proven by car safety researchers, as mentioned in the article.

Why shouldn't they precut the wall into cartoony shapes? It adds entertainment and doesn't compromise the demonstration.

[–] EpeeGnome@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I have something similar. I practice doing certain routine micro-habits until they become ingrained in muscle memory and always do them.

For example, I still set my keys down without thinking most times they are in my hand, but thanks to spending several hours practicing the motion years ago, I now always unthinkingly set them where they belong: clipped to my beltloop and tucked into my pocket. Anytime I identify a need to add one of these to my life I spend an hour practicing experiencing the trigger and then doing the motion. To learn the keys-in-pocket habit, I held my keys, clipped and tucked. Pull them out, note the feel of them in my hand, and repeat, over and over. It feels silly to practice doing something so easy, but once it becomes muscle memory, it doesn't rely on my faulty thinking memory. I'll do several sessions of practice every few days until I can feel that it's fully 'set' as an unthinking motion. They're a pain to establish, but they are well worth it and have saved me a ton of grief over the years.

One of these automatic habits saved me this morning. I always pat my keys when closing a locking door behind me (even if it isn't locked), and this morning I had missed swapping my keys to my new pair of pants. I would have been locked out of my house and late for work if patting my empty pockets hadn't alerted me just before a pulled the locked door close behind me. I have some other ones that I haven't mentioned, because I can't think of what they are. I'd notice the problems they prevent coming back if I stopped doing them, so I can only assume they must still be working.