Next say it to his face during one of the so called interviews.
ExLisper
joined 9 months ago
What's next? Parenting without a cell phone? That's crazy!
There's always a small chance police officer will be held accountable but in vast majority of cases the system simply doesn't work. Body cameras are part of that system. They are used to create evidence the police can control and use in their favor. In most cases they simply hide the recordings (https://www.propublica.org/article/how-police-undermined-promise-body-cameras?c_src=33685809.57194).
You should read this: https://prismreports.org/2024/07/16/complex-troubling-history-police-body-cameras/
"Long before body cameras were introduced to the public and found themselves in mainstream conversations about police reform, they were first peddled to police departments by tech companies and major corporations.
With body cameras, law enforcement agencies could expand their surveillance capacity, mitigate police brutality lawsuits, create “highly controllable evidence” against the largely poor, largely Black citizens of whom police often seek to capture footage, and quell social unrest by creating “comprehensive digital archives” of attendees at protests for social change"
"It was the 2014 police killing of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, that would forever change the public conversation around police accountability and allow body cameras to take center stage. Almost immediately, body cameras were no longer being pitched behind closed doors to police departments, but were rather presented to the public as an invaluable tool for police “reform” and increased “transparency.”"
Body cams were never a solution to anything. I remember multiple police murders recorded on body cams were the officer was acquitted by the jury. Police murder is basically legal in US*. Recording it doesn't change anything. As for police brutality in general they simply learned to shout "stop resisting" when beating people up. Without basic accountability the recording are useless.
*It's enough if police officer thinks he is in danger to make killing legal. Pretty much if he's scared he can shoot. Body cams can't prove he wasn't scared.
Except Tesla never made good cars. It was always clear that real car manufacturers will learn to make good EVs before Tesla learns to make good cars. For some time Tesla was supported by fans who could ignore major design flaws and investors looking for short term profits. Long term best case scenario for Tesla was always to just become another, normal car maker.
But they look so cute! Who wouldn't want to see this make a comeback:
The point is to limit time spent using Windows. Some people can take it down to 0%, others can't. Spending 10% less time on Windows still let's you learn about Linux and try different things. In couple of years you could change jobs or software and make it 50% Linux, then 90%... Not switching because you can't immediately make it 0% windows, 100% Linux is basically saying "I would switch but it would require effort on my side and would be inconvenient".
And yes, you're right, it doesn't make you lazy, sorry for that. It just means that you're not really that bothered by using Windows and avoiding it is not worth the effort for you. It's fine, just be honest about it.
About 20 years ago I would handle my email, IRC, watching movies and web browsing on Linux and each time I wanted to play Counter Strike I would reboot and switch to windows. After I was done with CS I would boot back to Linux. People who say they can't use Linux because X doesn't work there are just lazy.
The choice marked incorrectly or multiple choices marked.
Real anti-Israel or just anti-genocide?