Forbo

joined 2 years ago
[–] Forbo@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

I just attended an organizer training, and 70% of the people there were devs. Don't believe the corporate bullshit, unions are for everyone.

[–] Forbo@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

RIP Wacca. Taken too soon. 😭

[–] Forbo@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 months ago

Carcinization calls. Return to crab.

[–] Forbo@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The summary on here says that, but the actual article says it was Meta's.

In one eyebrow-raising example, Meta's large language model Llama 3 told a user who identified themself to it as a former addict named Pedro to indulge in a little methamphetamine — an incredibly dangerous and addictive drug — to get through a grueling workweek.

Might have been different in a previous version of the article, then updated, but the summary here doesn't reflect the change? I dunno.

[–] Forbo@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

It's also self-reinforcing, by making that the norm it then shapes future development and expectations. :-\

[–] Forbo@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)

Asymmetric bandwidth is literally designed to ensure you remain a consumer and is actively inhibiting the collaborative, communal web utopia we were told was going to be the future.

[–] Forbo@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Pete Ashdown's a badass. Big up XMission.

[–] Forbo@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago

If the link was unique to the email, then it could be a signal to the phisher that is a valid address for further targeting.

[–] Forbo@lemmy.ml 7 points 8 months ago

https://techcrunch.com/2019/03/06/waymo-to-start-selling-standalone-lidar-sensors/

Waymo’s top-of-range LiDAR cost about $7,500... Insiders say those costs have fallen further thanks to continuous advances by the team. And considering that this short-range LiDAR is cheaper than the top-of-range product, the price is likely under $5,000 a unit.

This article is six years old, so I wouldn't be surprised if they're even cheaper now.

[–] Forbo@lemmy.ml 76 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (40 children)

You're mischaracterizing their point. Nobody is saying take the exact piece of equipment, put it in the vehicle and PRESTO. That'd be like asking why the vacuum battery can't power the car. Because duh.

The point is if such a novelty, inconsequential item that doesn't have any kind of life safety requirements can employ a class of technology that would prevent adverse effects, why the fuck doesn't the vehicle? This is a design flaw of Teslas, pure and simple.

view more: next ›