Formfiller

joined 9 months ago
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Ireland is also boycotting

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think it’s because he’s a Zionist and so is his wife

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Future people are going to be shocked at the fact we let a literal Russian asset be president

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How bout ending funding to Israel

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 62 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Louvre not having a good year

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Except we don’t have this dog eat dog capitalism you’re talking about. We have communism for the rich because these big companies aren’t allowed to fail and are taking unlimited subsidies from us to destroy us. If they do start to fail the government gives them unlimited bail out money without any provisions against them giving the money to themselves . If by some freak chance a company does fail or fails because the shareholder class grifted all the wealth out of a company the CEO’s get huge handouts because the wealthy aren’t allowed to fail. Even failing is winning when everything is a grift paid for by the working people. The system you described is what workers have cut throat capitalism. If you lose you literally die.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

It’s almost like they’re paid by the same lobbyists as the republicans to perform political theater for the same puppet masters.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Damn that’s horrible. Well my household checked the Bernie box. We were extremely upset with the DNC’s shady dealings.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Republicans will design a car that rapes children to fix this

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

This is hell

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Both are correct we need a multilateral approach to win this. A peaceful movement is good but it’s a lot stronger if it’s backed by an adjacent movement that has some threat of force. A user above mentioned the civil rights movement with MLK being backed up by the Panthers. This was a great example because if you look at any successful revolution the approach was multilateral. The abolition movement was also multilateral

view more: next ›