Are you pretending that no one is broke in countries that have mandatory paid leave and “free” public health systems? As someone who lives in one of those countries myself I can, with 100% certainty, say you’re incredibly wrong.
The point is that being in debt isn’t the same as being broke and living paycheque to paycheque. Rich people have more debt than broke people because banks etc are far more willing to give rich people debt since they can actually pay it back.
In debt doesn’t mean broke. People with a mortgage that they are easily paying off have debt. Millionaires and billionaires have millions and billions in debt. Debt itself isn’t bad. Debt can be good.
Adam Sandler, even though I love a few of his movies like Uncut Gems, Waterboy, and Happy Gilmore.
Drew Barrymore. no exceptions.
Tom Holland.
Anthony Mackie.
Benedict Cumberbund or however you spell it.
Chris Pratt, I never got why he’s famous.
Because he was amazing in Parks and Rec.
After that though, as studios do they pushed and pushed and pushed him into everything and his acting skills don't hold up, so the fatigue and annoyance sets in.
What youve written at the end is not what’s happening.
It is though.
If law enforcement had access to all of your social media, e-mails and live video feeds from inside your house then they would be able to catch criminals more effectively.
This isn't the same because law enforcement don't have access to all of your social media already. This is more like if they did but were only allowed to arrest you for you posting a video of you murdering someone, but not for you posting a video of you raping someone.
Protection against unreasonable search is written into the constitution, after all
Your car registration being checked to see who it is registered to and if you have any outstanding warrants etc is not an "unreasonable search".
when ICE has degraded into a largely lawless and authoritarian organization
I think you're mistaking actually enforcing the law as being "lawless and authoritarian".
Now, what I’m a bit confused about is why you are so up-in-arms about the existence of this law instead of the violation of this law.
I'm not so "up in arms" about anything, just questioning why the authorities are handicapped on what they can use one of their systems for. Sure, the violation of the law is bad - but the law itself seems ridiculous. The only people it benefits are literally criminals.
Here in Australia if you have a credit card with an outstanding balance of $0 with a maximum limit of $10k, that actually acts as $10k of debt when you go to take out any loans etc.