FreedomAdvocate

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

People should still have an expectation of privacy in public spaces to some extent

Why? You're in a public space. You don't have privacy when you're out in public. There are already laws around taking photos of minors etc, but it being able to be done via glasses is no different to it being able to be done with a phone or a camera.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 year ago (9 children)

If I don’t have any income I can’t eat and will die.

Plenty of people don't have any income and can still eat and don't die. This alone proves you wrong.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Israel don't make Android. Apps can't override how android disables apps at an OS level.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 3 points 1 year ago (16 children)

The app’s privacy settings claim that users can disable this data collection by turning off “AppCloud” in the app list.

They don’t just “claim” that - that’s how Android works lol.

So in short the whole article could have just been “disable this app and you don’t have to worry about it”. Doesn’t have as much of a tinfoil ring to it I guess?

[–] FreedomAdvocate 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Valuing convenience over other things doesn’t make someone an idiot. As with everything, you evaluate a product on the benefits it gives vs the drawbacks it brings. For most people the benefits of cloud/online syncing far outweighs the drawbacks.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just be aware that, unless they’ve changed this since I last looked, when you do this it strips out all of the metadata and provides it all in a single file which you would then have to find software to write it back on to every photo (if you want the metadata that is).

[–] FreedomAdvocate -4 points 1 year ago (8 children)

If you don’t have cameras you instantly lose a tonne of potential amazing functionality.

If you’re in public you have no expectation of privacy, so someone being able to photograph you or record you with glasses is no different to being able to do it with a camera or phone.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 year ago (11 children)

This is like talking to a brick wall. If you don’t have a job you still have those costs, so that means those costs are not work related so can’t be claimed as tax deductions.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 6 points 1 year ago

Reviews legitimately make a HUGE difference in the online world, that’s why they ask for them.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A mix of both preferably - AMD cpu + Nvidia GPU. 32GB of RAM as well.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 2 points 1 year ago

People are going to hate this, but AI is perfect for this. You can literally just ask it to make whatever you want the website to look like in natural language and it will give you the code and generate a html page for you to preview.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Firstly do you mean software that the government uses, or that the government make? What about if they hire an external company to make it, which is pretty much what they always do?

I don’t think there is any need. It wouldn’t solve any problem or make anyone safer.

view more: ‹ prev next ›