Adam Sandler, even though I love a few of his movies like Uncut Gems, Waterboy, and Happy Gilmore.
Drew Barrymore. no exceptions.
Tom Holland.
Anthony Mackie.
Benedict Cumberbund or however you spell it.
Chris Pratt, I never got why he’s famous.
Because he was amazing in Parks and Rec.
After that though, as studios do they pushed and pushed and pushed him into everything and his acting skills don't hold up, so the fatigue and annoyance sets in.
What youve written at the end is not what’s happening.
It is though.
If law enforcement had access to all of your social media, e-mails and live video feeds from inside your house then they would be able to catch criminals more effectively.
This isn't the same because law enforcement don't have access to all of your social media already. This is more like if they did but were only allowed to arrest you for you posting a video of you murdering someone, but not for you posting a video of you raping someone.
Protection against unreasonable search is written into the constitution, after all
Your car registration being checked to see who it is registered to and if you have any outstanding warrants etc is not an "unreasonable search".
when ICE has degraded into a largely lawless and authoritarian organization
I think you're mistaking actually enforcing the law as being "lawless and authoritarian".
Now, what I’m a bit confused about is why you are so up-in-arms about the existence of this law instead of the violation of this law.
I'm not so "up in arms" about anything, just questioning why the authorities are handicapped on what they can use one of their systems for. Sure, the violation of the law is bad - but the law itself seems ridiculous. The only people it benefits are literally criminals.
For being illegal immigrants? No they're not lol.
Edit: lol at the reply that you deleted. Unlucky for you I can still see it. They deported an illegal immigrant, and her underage kids went with her. Would you have preferred they separated the kids from the mother? Just leave the 7 year old in the USA alone?
But you’re saying, like, sure it’s dystopian and creepy and wrong, but why wouldn’t the creepy dystopia use the tech for all cases then rather than just some?
I'm also saying it's not really any more creepy or dystopian than say ..... speed cameras. They're there to catch people that break the law. If these cameras are already used to catch people breaking some laws, the logic of "well they should only be allowed to catch people who break these specific laws, but not these other laws" doesn't make any sense.
If you know the license plate of a car of a wanted murderer, and the FLOCK camera system recognises that number plate, why on earth would anyone be against the FLOCK camera system arbitrarily not being allowed to be used to catch that murderer? Like what is the reasoning behind that train of thought?
Yeh here in australia anyone can go buy a card reader to accept payments. I know in America you can do iphone to iphone direct payments too.
I just dont think many homeless people will have them haha
web endpoints with zero authentication lol
You really need a citation for that? In a topic asking why there's so much hate towards him? You need a citation for me answering the question? Did you ask OP for a citation? Are you asking every person who replies in here for citations?