FreedomAdvocate

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I assume you think you’re replying to someone else as I’ve said none of those things other than the first.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’ve got a quest 2, but no I don’t want to wear a headset.

2m is a long way away from a tv.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 year ago

I did. Did you?

[–] FreedomAdvocate -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ah so you’re just going to pretend that the very real reason is a fake used by racists, simply because you have no actual reason to disagree with it and because it’s not actually racist. Gotcha.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Net overseas migration Net overseas migration is the net gain or loss of population through international migration to and from Australia.

In the year ending 30 June 2024, overseas migration contributed a net gain of 446,000 people to Australia's population. This was a decrease from the record 536,000 people the previous year.

How do you think this is being misinterpreted?

[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

https://aussie.zone/comment/18671602

We don’t know the current numbers per day in net migration, but we know that just 2 years ago it was 1500 per day because the ABS themselves tell us on their own website. Last year it was over 1200 per day. This year it is likely closer to 1500 with how quickly the government has been importing voters.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Did you not even read my comment?

The ABS, on their own website and documents, show that the net migration - not the OAD data - just 2 years ago was 1500 a day, and last year was 1200 a day. With how quickly this government has been trying to pack electorates with newly imported Labor voters it’s absolutely possible it’s back to 1500 per day.

So what is it - you believe the ABS or you don’t?

The ABS are saying “that number isn’t what you think it is” about number A, while number B which is what people think number A is is virtually identical.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 year ago

Yeh I get you. It’s like when turning the difficulty up in a game all they do is make enemies take more damage to kill and do significantly more damage when they hit you. That’s just crap. Difficulty increases should be about more than that, like better AI and more/different enemies.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The stage 3 cuts that meant more lower income earners are better off? Why would they protest those?

Keep calling everyone Nazis, it worked out well for the democrats. I’m sure it’ll work out well for you too.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your question is irrelevant. They weren’t organised by neo-nazi. Only 1 of them I believe let one of the neo-Nazis speak, and they were rightly criticised for doing so.

Neo-Nazis attempting to take over a march about X and turn it into Y doesn’t make it a march about Y. You guys need to stop pretending it does, all you’re doing is trying to convince yourself and again - turning everyday people against you.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks for this, I’ll give the plugin change a go.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -2 points 1 year ago

This happened at like 1 of the marches the other day, they were told to fuck off from all the others.

view more: ‹ prev next ›