FreedomAdvocate

joined 11 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Then explain why one can successfully use and old synology to “mark” drives as “authentic synology” and move them into a newer DSM model to use them.

Because they have to have a way for legacy users to maintain functionality. Going forward though, new drives in new devices are handled differently. It's basically a quality control type thing - they're providing the support and warranty for them, so they're only "guaranteeing" that their checks work on their drives. That makes sense. They don't want to be on the hook for saying that a drive that isn't theirs was perfectly healthy and then it drops dead an hour later and you lose all your data.

As explained ad nauseum on various yt channels, having a hw compatibility list makes sense for users likely to buy support, like business users.

Again though, the disks still work. The compatibility lists simply tell you if they are officially supported and will get certain features.

But add on top of it that there is no functional hardware difference between certified and non-certified, and it becomes pretty clear that Synology is to be avoided.

But add on top of it that there is no functional hardware difference between certified and non-certified, and it becomes pretty clear that Synology is to be avoided.

Avoiding them because of missing a few proprietary synology disk health checks is such a strange thing to do lol. You won't get synologys disk health checks if you were to make your own server, so why is not having them on a synology a deal breaker?

[–] FreedomAdvocate 5 points 10 months ago

Did you not get that job because you failed a drug test though? I'm going to assume no.

If you get fired from a job that a recruiter got you because you failed a drug test, you'll be blacklisted by not only that recruiter but most other recruiters in the area. Source: few good friends who are recruiters for prominent recruitment firms, they tell me stories.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Would I interview to a job where I know I wouldn't get the job if they drug test before hiring, or would be fired because they would drug test me after hiring me? No, because that would be a waste of time.

Also don't take drugs and then drive for a job please.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Israel have no ability to legally take ownership of houses or neighbourhoods in palestine. The South African government literally made laws to do it - but only to white peoples property.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Israel is singing “kill all the white man!” and making laws so they can literally steal white peoples property with no recourse and no way to fight it?

[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 10 months ago

I was about to give a genuine reply, then I read your second sentence and now I realize there's no point. Straight to the tired old garbage "boot licker" insults. Have fun.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 3 points 10 months ago

So not Microsofts fault then :). Universities should not be using employee licenses for students.

view more: ‹ prev next ›