FreedomAdvocate

joined 8 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] FreedomAdvocate 0 points 1 month ago (11 children)

The Chinese communist party ruling a communist country are not “right wing” lol.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They don’t subsidise the purchase price of petrol cars.

Should the oil industry be subsidised? Absolutely not, they would still be extremely profitable without the subsidies. It’s pure corruption by politicians who want to help their mates, help keep the donations flowing, and want to position themselves for cushy exec jobs and board seats when they leave politics.

The EV market is different though, as this situation shows. The oil industry doesn’t need subsidies. The EV market, as well as the “renewables” market, do.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 month ago (6 children)

What computers do now was considered “impossible” once. What cars do now was considered “impossible” once. That’s my point - saying absolutes like “impossible” in tech is a giant red flag.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -3 points 1 month ago

Because corruption, mostly.

Oil however is a bit different as the world would literally collapse without it. We have no replacement for it. We need it.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It’s both left leaning and fascist, because the left want fascism as long as it’s controlled by them.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 43 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

New Study

Study is from 2020 on data from 2018 lol

[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 1 month ago (16 children)

You think the Chinese Communist Party are right wing? Did I get that right?

[–] FreedomAdvocate 3 points 1 month ago (10 children)

If a product can only exist with huge government subsidies, it's probably not ready for the market. These cuts are because of the government cutting federal tax rebates for purchasing an EV.

I love EVs, and my next car will likely be one, but if you can't make an EV at a price point that people will buy them at without the government essentially using taxpayer money to discount them, then you shouldn't be making EVs.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 month ago

"Gamblers targeted by gambling sites"

"Company targets their core demographic"

Mild shock!

[–] FreedomAdvocate 5 points 1 month ago

The main issue with this is that the computer is compromised before this attack can occur. The user has already fallen prey to a virus. This exploit isn't a super urgent priority really because it only affects already compromised PCs.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

to deploy the PlugX remote access trojan (RAT) malware and gain persistence on compromised systems

Wait it already requires a compromised system?

However, user interaction is required for successful exploitation, as it involves tricking potential victims into visiting a malicious page or opening a malicious file.

Yep! So it's essentially just user error, with the user downloading a virus, which then lets attackers do other stuff. So......a virus.

They definitely made it sound more "fuck windows!" in the title though, which is nice hey?

view more: ‹ prev next ›