FreedomAdvocate

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Sure, but the Redmagic doesn’t have things the Samsung does - one of which seems to be a dealbreaker for you, the built in stylus.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 year ago

So they were sabotaging nasa for all those years before SpaceX was a thing for what reason?

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 year ago

You have any links to support that it’s just cheap materials causing the failures?

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 1 year ago

They didn’t circumvent the issue - they did what Microsoft tell developers to do in regards to their programs and recall lol.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is just a thinly veiled ad for AdGuard.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 0 points 1 year ago (5 children)

If you would get that why wouldn’t you just get a Galaxy S2X Ultra?

[–] FreedomAdvocate 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So you think those privately funded politicians should be in charge of the state of SpaceX?

[–] FreedomAdvocate -2 points 1 year ago

Your comment says yes.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 4 points 1 year ago

It’s almost like it was by design.

They also just spy on their own citizens anyway, because who is going to stop them?

[–] FreedomAdvocate -2 points 1 year ago

Ideological reasons? You think nasa hasn’t made reusable self landing rockets and boosters because of ideological reasons?

[–] FreedomAdvocate 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sending something one way into space isn’t hard. Having it come back is. Having it, and all the parts that it took to get it there and back, be safely returned to earth and able to be reused is stupidly hard.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 0 points 1 year ago

What points are you talking about exactly?

view more: ‹ prev next ›