FreedomAdvocate

joined 11 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 10 months ago (6 children)

So you’d rather they just close the company down, so then no one can use their VPN. Big brain move.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 52 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Wonder what their reason for this is.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 10 months ago (8 children)

Without being able to offer any idea of a solution though, saying that means nothing. The company either gets shut down and those users get fucked and have no VPN, or the company stays alive and the users have no VPN but have the option to get one again.

The point is there’s no real way the lifetime licenses get honoured.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -3 points 10 months ago (11 children)

The new owners mentioned that in the article. They said it would cost more to do than it would to just shut the business down.

What good outcome do you think the lifetime license owners would get in that situation?

[–] FreedomAdvocate 3 points 10 months ago

Yeh this was it - great acting by Robert, but the first half of the movie was what the trailers made us think the whole movie was going to focus on.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

It’s not bad, but the pacing is terrible and it’s not really the movie that the trailers made it out to be. The concept and trailer made it look like a completely different movie.

I still enjoyed it, but I’d only give it a 6/10. Robert Pattinson is quickly turning into one of my favourite actors though, he’s great in it.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 2 points 10 months ago (9 children)

Are you sure about that?

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 10 months ago (18 children)

Sorry but this is completely untrue. Microsoft are still a very innovative company.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 10 months ago

This is saying that digital verification providers would need to record the sex of the person they’re verifying the identity of. That seems logical since gender can be changed.

view more: ‹ prev next ›