The phrasing is only stupid if you are trying to have an issue with it. Obviously you and the person you're chatting to can read your messages. That doesn't need to be said, it's inferred.
End to End Encryption is easy. Why do you guys all seem to think it's hard?
How did you get that from what I said?
If you don’t trust it you can still read the emails. If you do, you don’t have to read the emails. If want to confirm what it does say a few times until you can decide if you trust it or not, you can do that.
Google “read” your emails and feed them into their AI regardless, always have. They don’t need your “consent” to add features or make UI changes.
I’m assuming you actually mean it should’ve been off by default?
I literally just showed you why studies shouldn’t just be trusted, and you come back with this?
It’s becoming quite evident why you won’t answer about your education level.
I think a summary of an email is going to be right more like 9.5/10 times.
From the sidebar:
Was I uncivil in what I said? You're definitely being uncivil. I'm not "super right wing" and I'm definitely not "trolling". I'm here for a discussion, clearly unlike you.