FreedomAdvocate

joined 11 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I haven’t signed into reddit since they bent the knee to musk.

What did I miss here? Reddit hates musk.....

[–] FreedomAdvocate 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

100%. Reddit loves bots that they control, like the ones that go back and constantly re-post years old top rated, traffic driving content, complete with a replica of the entire comment section posted by hundreds/thousands of bots, because they can use it to do their bidding in pushing agendas and/or driving traffic/engagement.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Lemmy is the same in terms of ownership btw, as is pretty much every online platform. Anything you post is owned by the owner of the instance that it is on and that it federates to. You don't own it.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I did, there is no ongoing invasion OR predatory incursion. There’s the issue

According to you, but you don't get to decide that. According to the President however, who DOES get to decide if there is, there is. Your own links say this.

If you don't like that the President has the power to do this under the Alien Enemy Act, you should say that instead of saying that the President doesn't have the power to do it when he clearly does.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 10 months ago

While I very much like the idea and would be happy for it to be made law, if they can do it for "poor people" why can't they just do it for everyone? If the government is going to step in and price regulate a non-government company, why stop at only doing it for "poor people"? Far more than just "poor people" could massively benefit from saving $30/month on their internet bill.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It’s wild that it costs over $30 at all for you guys.

Your plan costs $45 a month though?

[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 10 months ago

Explain how your Mental gymnastics is twisting the literal text into something it’s not, and I’ll apologize. Give me a line by line of the actual text, not an interpretation. I came with facts. You’ve come with feelings.

Your entire point is based on the fact that only congress can declare war, and the act can only be invoked during war.

That point is 100% incorrect, as shown by your own links. Your own links say it can also be invoked during an invasion, and that an invasion can be declared by the President.

I haven't come with "feelings", I've come with facts - fact that you have also provided but misunderstood.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -5 points 10 months ago

Yeah, emphasis on slowly - because that is how it has been planned. They're slowly rolling out the changes to prevent another Windows 8 type backlash.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ok i dont know what the deal is with this "max comment depth" error since you can clearly still go further.

Yes? And did you keep reading? How those words are specifically used during wartime or invasion which this is clearly not?

The president is the one that gets to decide if an invasion is happening, per the act.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

again "max comment depth":

Are you pretending that the last 2 sentences of the text on that image, which I have already pointed out, do not exist? Here, I'll point it out again:

But the president need not wait for congress to invoke the law based on a threatened or ongoing invasion or predatory incursion

This is what the President did, and the act allows for it.

view more: ‹ prev next ›