That’s not newsworthy because it’s nothing new or unexpected. “US companies obey US law” isn’t newsworthy.
As I said in another comment, it’s not Microsoft’s position to be the judge of who is and isn’t fascist. It’s their position to stay in business, and you don’t do that by disobeying the government.
Do you think Microsoft should have sacrificed the entire company instead of follow the law?
You’re forgetting the fact that the government ordered MS to do this. Moving your data to the EU does nothing to prevent any EU government from ordering the same thing.
Am I supposed to come up with new arguments every time? Israel are trying to eliminate Hamas. That’s the goal. Sorry if I keep repeating it. Maybe I’m repeating it because you refuse to acknowledge it?
You say:
This give Israel the right to do whatever it takes
No, I say that Hamas started the war and Israel are trying to finish it.
I say Israel aren’t committing a genocide because their intent is only to stop an internationally recognised terrorist organisation.
You're talking about in Jerusalem?
Then explain why one can successfully use and old synology to “mark” drives as “authentic synology” and move them into a newer DSM model to use them.
Because they have to have a way for legacy users to maintain functionality. Going forward though, new drives in new devices are handled differently. It's basically a quality control type thing - they're providing the support and warranty for them, so they're only "guaranteeing" that their checks work on their drives. That makes sense. They don't want to be on the hook for saying that a drive that isn't theirs was perfectly healthy and then it drops dead an hour later and you lose all your data.
As explained ad nauseum on various yt channels, having a hw compatibility list makes sense for users likely to buy support, like business users.
Again though, the disks still work. The compatibility lists simply tell you if they are officially supported and will get certain features.
But add on top of it that there is no functional hardware difference between certified and non-certified, and it becomes pretty clear that Synology is to be avoided.
But add on top of it that there is no functional hardware difference between certified and non-certified, and it becomes pretty clear that Synology is to be avoided.
Avoiding them because of missing a few proprietary synology disk health checks is such a strange thing to do lol. You won't get synologys disk health checks if you were to make your own server, so why is not having them on a synology a deal breaker?
Did you not get that job because you failed a drug test though? I'm going to assume no.
If you get fired from a job that a recruiter got you because you failed a drug test, you'll be blacklisted by not only that recruiter but most other recruiters in the area. Source: few good friends who are recruiters for prominent recruitment firms, they tell me stories.
Would I interview to a job where I know I wouldn't get the job if they drug test before hiring, or would be fired because they would drug test me after hiring me? No, because that would be a waste of time.
Also don't take drugs and then drive for a job please.
Does EU law prevent a countries government from ordering a social media account to be blocked?