The kids went with their mother who was deported for being an illegal immigrant. They weren’t deported. Would you rather they were separated from their mother? You want the 4 year old to stay in America by themself?
You’re a trans man, according to yourself. Or did you lie?
It sounds like OP is charging users to stream from his server, that’s why he freaked out.
I just saw you guys did your first iOS app update in 3 years, and first Xbox app update in 5 years, congrats!
Now what was that I was saying about being left behind again?
Heaven forbid people take any personal responsibility.
No one is saying you should be banned from identifying Nazis. What people are saying is that when you call your neighbour a Nazi because they left their bin on the footpath for emptying on the wrong night, people stop caring when you call anyone a Nazi.
Actual Nazi-like people then just get to carry on being disgusting people because when you go “there’s a Nazi!” no one listens to you or cares because you’ve called them all Nazis at some stage too over trivial things.
So if you answer a question wrong on a test you didn’t complete the test?
You’ve just spouted their party approved talking points like a good little party member. None of their plans actually do any of that. For all their “trying” to spend billions on housing, they’ve built nothing. They’ve been in power!!! They built nothing houses! Trying to get cheaper electricity? They’re not trying very hard by tripling electricity costs and locking us in to higher prices by “renewables”! Help the environment by bulldozing all the trees to build endless non-recyclable solar panels and wind turbines? No one “doesn’t want LBGTQ people to exist” lol.
Almost everything this Labor party has done is a complete shitshow, NDIS included. Labor are now looking at taxing unrealized gains on people’s super ffs!
I know that, which is why I ignored that specific clearly rhetorical question. Banning landlords isn’t how you fix a housing crisis.
The massive, gigantic problem with this is you’re making the assumption that party X will use legal loopholes to destroy democracy, and are using that assumption to instead destroy democracy by banning them over things you claim that they will do. You’re saying “we’re going to ban you for being antidemocratic because we think that one day you might be antidemocratic, so we’re gonna go ahead and be antidemocratic first”.