FreedomAdvocate

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (7 children)

Fuck ‘em - they need to be taxed more

You say this about the people that pay the majority of all income taxes already lol. When did this commie “successful people should be penalised more and more for being successful!” ideology become so popular in Australia?

No amount of extra tax from the wealthy is going to result in reduced taxes for everyone else. The wealthy and the high earners already pay almost all of the tax. All it’s going to do is end up in more government waste and corruption.

Also……why do they need to be taxed more? Are they using more government services than everyone else? Do they get special roads that only they get to drive on?

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 3 months ago

Yeh they should stay here so we can throw them in jail if they dare say anything that anyone could say they take offence too. Such a free country we have.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

So those earning less than $45k will get taxed less on their super that they can access when they turn 65. In terms of tax reform to help people in need, this does exactly fuck all.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 2 points 3 months ago (9 children)

I’ve never understood the point of hosting your own single user instance - can anyone explain?

[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (12 children)

Where did I mention crime?

The housing crisis is caused by supply and demand. Importing over 1000 people a day while building no houses will do that.

You’re the one who is being duped by the looks of it, eating up all their excuses for why supply and demand isn’t the issue.

Billionaires are not the problem.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 3 months ago

They wanted to tax unrealised gains, and their plans weren’t indexed so every year the lower classes would get closer and closer to being affected. Thank god it didn’t go through. Taxing unrealised gains is one of the dumbest things anyone has ever suggested.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

It helps men not be branded as and treated like rapists based solely on an unproven accusation.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -2 points 3 months ago
[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 3 months ago

if the purpose was to allow companies to collect people’s ID information

That wasn’t the purpose. The purpose was to condition people to requiring verification to use things. That way when the inevitable digital ID comes along, people will already be used to having to authenticate themselves to access websites and services, so there won’t be as much pushback.

Parents should be in charge of monitoring/limiting their kids access to social media, not the government. That’s kinda a parents job - raising your children. It’s not the governments job.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 3 months ago

You think Windows is a dead end? The OS that is the overwhelming market leader in the category?

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 3 months ago

They’re not even being courted by the “far right” - they’re just being pushed away from the left, by the left.

Whoever would have thought that calling people names, attacking them, etc simply for existing and daring to not bow to your ideology is not the way to make friends and get people on your side? Incredible.

view more: ‹ prev next ›