FreedomAdvocate

joined 8 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 3 months ago

“Just make the rules super vague and subject to a single person mood on the day and if you break them you’re all sorts of fucked”….. you’re not serious are you?

Absolutely nothing about these authoritarian rules are “public”. It’s just more power being handed to the eKaren to use for her political and ideological reasons, with exactly zero accountability, oversight, or way for us to have a say.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 3 months ago

I’m just surprised they haven’t done this earlier tbh.

Everyone needs to switch to rumble or some other alternative so they can gain traction and become a legit competitor.

I wish Microsoft and Amazon and Apple would create their own YT alternatives. While they’re also megacorps, at least the competition would favour us in the meantime.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -3 points 3 months ago

Read the article maybe?

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 3 months ago

Even if an external company makes it, they can add an open source mandate if they want.

Sure they could, but like I said, the're isn't really any need for it. It being open source doesn't make it more secure or better by default, but it does means that anyone wanting to exploit it just got handed the full codebase to make it easier.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

It sounds like you’re supporting compelled speech

How on earth do you come to that conclusion? Do you even know what "compelled speech" is? What is it?

I know you don't know btw, but I will have a good laugh at you trying to explain it.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

the actual fascist “nobody deserves to be safe” garbage

Everybody deserves to be safe. What are you talking about? Someone badmouthing you behind your back doesn't make you "unsafe". Despite what you might try to pretend, words are NOT violence.

Just adjust it, you want to use your own personal freedoms as a cludge to undermine the rights of others.

How? What am I saying that even remotely hints at anything like this?

[–] FreedomAdvocate 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The glasses don't record and stream all the time btw. They don't have their own built in wireless connection to meta.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

People should still have an expectation of privacy in public spaces to some extent

Why? You're in a public space. You don't have privacy when you're out in public. There are already laws around taking photos of minors etc, but it being able to be done via glasses is no different to it being able to be done with a phone or a camera.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 1 points 3 months ago (9 children)

If I don’t have any income I can’t eat and will die.

Plenty of people don't have any income and can still eat and don't die. This alone proves you wrong.

view more: ‹ prev next ›