HobbitFoot

joined 2 years ago
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 7 months ago

I get it, but I'm talking about taking specific information from a facility that you can't find online. There are records, but there isn't an AI that can read all the drawings and churn out details.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 7 months ago

Perhaps, but I'm talking about are problems within human limits. For example, take information from 5 different sources to synthesize an answer to a question.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 16 points 7 months ago (4 children)

The ability to process information. It seems like the reason need AI to summarize different things is because they never learned how to do it themselves.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 102 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Probably bisexual, but you've got a type.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 45 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The problem with $10 million homes is that people who buy them can afford to build their own $10 million homes. Because of that, they are worth less than people think.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 9 points 7 months ago

There are three things occurring with this new facility:

  1. Construction - Generally, the cost of construction is far larger than the tax for the construction project. The county may build the jail in a few years, but the taxes to pay for it usually take over a decade to pay back.

  2. Operation - Once you open the facility, you have to use it. That generally requires some form of operations budget. Facilities cost money to run and intelligent governments try to plan that into building a new facility.

  3. Maintenance - The building isn't going to last forever, and a lot of modern buildings need more effort to maintain them then older buildings. It is common for facilities to need significant maintenance work every 15 years. If you're going to bond to build a facility, why not include maintenance as part of the total cost of life for the facility?

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 7 months ago

I find it depends on how they get compensated.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

To add to it, I wouldn't put "Internet" as a subculture since that is way too broad of a definition of place.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 7 months ago

Less integrated and with more fear.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 18 points 7 months ago

Most constitutional monarchies got that way due to incremental change generally caused by political crises. Switching from a monarchy to a republic usually done as a response to one of these crises; no crisis usually means the monarch keeps the crown.

You also have an issue of what to replace the monarch with. Most constitutional monarchies have parliamentary systems of government where the legislature has supremacy. However, you still need a supreme executive to run a government when the legislature fails. The process of picking that person is very politically important and had inherent risks to it. For some countries, keeping the monarch as the on/off switch is easier than dealing with the headache of choosing a President.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 7 points 7 months ago

Sorry, the homeless shelter got defunded. Don't worry, they'll turn it to luxury condos.

view more: ‹ prev next ›