Says the person who has only responded to actual data with propaganda
Lumiluz
joined 3 months ago
Better name too
I'd download this but I'm worried it could also contain some form of advanced spyware, and my "security computer" needs a new screen cable at the moment.
It wouldn't, but I think that ship has sailed already. I don't see how your current governmental structure would ever fix that. It's been a problem since citizens united, if not before
Counterpoint - under the current administration, paying taxes might help Russia more
Of course you, who looked into this, barely have any notice.
It's not an association fallacy or poisoning the well if those things are actually being done, which has already been covered in the previous comments. Goggles is another current example of that.
You can go on and have your last word now, I'm done with your bad faith argument. I think there's enough evidence in this comment thread by now for others to see you're being disingenuous.
If you're happy with tracking and spying at the browser level, then fine, but I'm interested in how we can put an end to that.
And brave has shown it's not a solution to that at all, so there's literally no reason to defend them, or use them.
Goggles is the first part, the owner is the second part
In short, I support these probably for the same reason you oppose Eich: I believe in freedom. I guess I define that a bit more liberally than you do.
I know you fake mofos are the type to always need to get the last word because it makes it seem to other dumdums that getting the last say is somehow "winning", but I'm leaving this link here for anyone who remotely might believe your take is a good one:
view more: next ›
If we're doing anecdotes, the Mexican side of my family loves Sheinbaum too and are not in Lemmy (+1 friend and her boyfriend as well)