If you have to move your jaw to an uncomfortable position for anything, it's a bad idea. That said, a lightbulb should be pretty simple... for a SLUT!
LurkingLuddite
joined 9 months ago
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. All I see are legs that have never completed a single squat.
The people to blame are the morons that hooked up utilities controls to the internet...
Psychopaths correctly identify that both parties of many countries are ran by people more interested in enriching themselves than helping the people.
This is not a symptom of certain parties being more vile, but a symptom of both parties having been infiltrated by these scum.
That does not make the parties equal, so this whole thing really comes off as utterly and completely missing the point.
What if they need any one of the hundreds of pounds of equipment and drugs that'll still be in the ambulance?
Might be an assumption, but it's still based on some implied evidence by watching her behavior.
So... your snippy retort only makes sense if you assume she's a bad judge of character. That's also an assumption.
Why don't you want to give women the benefit of the doubt?
RO is definitely the way to go, though interesting you couldn't get it below what the meter could detect. Both of my RO setups get to 0 detectable from ~500ppm, and one's only a three stage.
No, you just experienced Brita filters doing almost nothing to the water. They only absorb a few tasting chemicals and do fuck all for actually filtering the water.
Project Farm on YouTube has two videos about filters, and Brita et. al. that are about making "tasty" water fail miserably every time.
You are only partially correct. The systems have plastic in them, but that's nowhere in any way a guarantee they're adding more plastic than they're removing. At all.
Except a good programmer will have proof, in the form of at minimum manual tests that exercise the exact issue. A good programmer will have automated tests that clearly assert the behavior in question.
It genuinely boggles my mind when people whine about having to prove what the AI said... THEY SHOULD'VE BEEN DOING THAT THE WHOLE FUCKING TIME in their entire career!
The statistical artifact is the interesting part so many people reference, so I don't see the problem. It's just often used to reference only the subset of idiots that don't know much and think they do. That's still a big section of people exhibiting peculiar behavior even if the conclusion is, "on average, people over and under estimate at similar rates". It was never the about the rates.
But is Gimp Affinity's Gimp? Or is there competition there?