While specific populations — including men who have sex with men (MSM)
I see the mainstream media are doing some.. rebranding
While specific populations — including men who have sex with men (MSM)
I see the mainstream media are doing some.. rebranding
A more onion-y title would be something like "Conservative commentator quotes Marx, calls for mass protests and strikes".
The actual title is more just !ironicorsurprisingnews than !nottheonion material imo
Edit: You've editorialized the title?
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Unless it was changed post-publication, the original is
Conservative NYT Columnist David Brooks Calls for ‘National Civic Uprising’ to Defeat Trumpism – Complete With ‘Mass Rallies, Strikes’
Imo that's actually more onion-y than the changed title
Yeah no worries, just thinking out loud :P
Poe's law vs internet comments
I'm never quite sure how much info to quote in the submission body for links like this, since with those summaries I imagine very few people will actually bother to read it now. Maybe most people wouldn't bother to read it either way though, idk.
Not 100% sure, though I'm leaning towards it actually being fortified (with perhaps a lower level being naturally occurring) given that the person on the verge of losing all their vegemite isn't saying "wtf it's naturally occurring" in response to "it's not allowed to have added vitamin B"
https://www.aldi.com.au/product/vegemite-vegemite-370g-000000000000370431
Ingredients: yeast extract (wheat, barley), salt, mineral salt (508), malt extract (barley), colour (150c), flavours, niacin [aka B3], thiamine [aka B1], riboflavin [aka B2], folate [aka B9].
Sure sounds like there's some extra added in there to me
I had a similar thought, and the announcement also came with a climate protestor who I guess had it (well the climate change part at least) on their mind too: https://fedia.io/m/australianpolitics@aussie.zone/t/2024597
what do you think?
Hah, I think I appreciate your constructive optimism
Those are the two easy ones that come to mind; there's also "visibility-raising" actions like joining in on marches / protests, though I've never been quite sure what the marginal benefit of those are
Hi Kurroth
Sorry, I'm not quite sure what you mean. Could you please clarify your statement?
Kind regards, MHLoppy
A significant degree of policy is, for better or worse, dictated by whoever of the big 2 forms majority or majority-of-minority government. So of course, people can/should vote for parties that are stronger on policies that they care about like climate, but movement in the platforms of the big two matters a lot as well.
Haha, yeah that's what I was getting at - maybe need to leave a stronger clue next time 😅