Meltdown
Since you seem to be the one trolling me with your GPT replies, I guess I'll report you too?
As soon as you resorted to AI, it was clear that you were not interested in discussion or debate, you're only interested in pushing the same tired antisemitic narrative, and you're incredibly lazy about it. You have such little conviction in what you're saying that you had to resort to canned replies provided by some machine that thinks for you, not only undermining everything you say, but also revealing what a sad, desperate sort of person is actually fighting so fiercely from behind the safety of a keyboard. Now you're tucking tail and running, claiming that it's actually your opponent who's acting badly, when you have demonstrated repeatedly that you're not really a serious interlocutor. It's a classic fascist technique: avoid having to admit that your position is flawed by pretending that the game is unfair and rigged against you. Enjoy your sad little life, you pathetic little Nazi.
Lmao, thanks ChatGPT, I'm glad you have a well-reasoned perspective you've investigated thoroughly and you're not just repeating what some machine has told you to think. You'd really love to draw the kinds of distinctions your AI has made for you, but they're similarly predicated on making arbitrary distinctions between identical concepts in order to denigrate the Jews. That's the kind of logical flaw a human might be able to recognize, if you take the time to think things though. At least have enough self respect to come up with your own thoughts next time; using AI to argue for you is intellectually dishonest, pathetically lazy, and only serves to reveal that you neither understand nor actually believe the nonsense you're parroting.
Well, you almost sounded reasonable. If Muslims conquering Palestine and establishing a colony is not "occupation" in your eyes, but Jews conquering Palestine and establishing a colony is "occupation", then it seems like you're just back at antisemitism again. There is no such thing as a legitimate claim to land ownership; all such claims are backed by past acts of violence or the threat of future violence. The Muslims are no more legitimate occupiers of the land than the Jews are, but they are the ones to establish the precedent of conquering lands and taking them for themselves. If you're willing to condemn conquest and territorial occupation when it's done by Jews, but you're not willing to condemn conquest and territorial occupation when it's done by Muslims, then it's clear that your issue is not with conquest and occupation at all, but with Jews.
Well, at least you're willing to acknowledge that the Muslim colonial occupation of Palestine is illegitimate. Both the Jews and the Muslims have acted atrociously in Palestine, but people so often claim that the Muslims have a "right" to the land simply because their colonialist conquest happened a long time ago, so it's nice for you to acknowledge that their occupation there is just as illegitimate as the state of Israel.
So what, you're saying that those statements are accurate, but you're willing to ignore them because Israel feels the same way about the Muslim occupation of Palestine as Muslims feel about Jewish occupation of Palestine? If you defend the one while condemning the other, it's hard to see how the distinction could be anything other than antisemitism.
Yeah, I guess verbatim quotations from Palestinian leadership isn't enough to establish what they think. Too bad I don't have your standards of just applying feelings without regard for the facts; you're wise not to let logic or human decency stand in the way of your antisemitism, you might accidentally develop some self awareness
If you have the same sex as your partner, then it's a same sex relationship. If you have the same gender as your partner, it's a same gender relationship. Possibly it's both or neither.
Very bassy bamboo flutes